# Nginx deployments survey

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454>\
**Category:** NGINX\
**Created:** [January 9, 2013, 11:01am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454 "2013-01-09T11:01:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/258eb7/32.png) [@aris](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/aris)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2013, 11:01am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/1 "2013-01-09T11:01:33Z")

</div>

Hello,

We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We’ve got a  
lot of feedback too from a variety of users.

However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we’d  
appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your time and take a  
look at our online survey:

> **[Survey Move Alert | QuestionPro](https://www.questionpro.com/survey-has-moved.html)**
>
> This survey has been moved.

This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust priorities  
in 2013 and to make nginx better.

Many thanks in advance!

–  
Andrew A.  
nginx

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2013, 7:19am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/2 "2013-01-10T07:19:06Z")

</div>

* * *

nginx mailing list  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid  
[http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx](http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2013, 9:59am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/3 "2013-01-10T09:59:49Z")

</div>

Done!  
Thanks for the excellent work in the past 2012!

2013/1/9 Andrew A. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid):

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2013, 4:35pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/4 "2013-01-14T16:35:58Z")

</div>

Hai Andrew,

Am 09-01-2013 11:01, schrieb Andrew A.:

> Hello,

[snipp]

> [http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/](http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/)
> 
> This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust  
> priorities in 2013 and to make nginx better.
> 
> Many thanks in advance!

It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means  
to nginx roadmap.

Best regards  
Aleks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2013, 4:38pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/5 "2013-01-14T16:38:19Z")

</div>

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Aleksandar L. wrote:

> > Many thanks in advance!
> 
> It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means to nginx  
> roadmap.

Definitely. But first we need more responses to make it statistically  
valid 🙂 And then we’ll definitely plan to make a blog post or something  
with an aggregated summary and notes about roadmap.

Thanks a lot for those participating!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2013, 8:54pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/6 "2013-01-14T20:54:46Z")

</div>

On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:41 PM, itpp2012 wrote:

> Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be  
> sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets done  
> faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to get  
> it done.
> 
> Posted at Nginx Forum:  
> [http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071](http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071)

Thanks for completing the survey and thanks for the suggestion. We  
actually have this, though it’s currently structured a bit differently  
(single/few sponsors per feature vs. crowdfunding)

During 2012 the following features were sponsored:

- SPDY (Automattic)
- OCSP Stapling (GlobalSign, Comodo, DigiCert)
- Chunked transfer encoding on input (sponsor preferred to refrain from  
public announcement)
- WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be  
disclosed)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2013, 8:41pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/7 "2013-01-14T20:41:55Z")

</div>

Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be  
sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets  
done  
faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to  
get  
it done.

Posted at Nginx Forum:

> **[Re: nginx deployments survey](https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071)**
>
> Hello, We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We've got a lot of feedback too from a variety of users. However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we'd appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@chillexistence](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/chillexistence)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2013, 10:13pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-deployments-survey/225454/8 "2013-01-30T22:13:56Z")

</div>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Andrew A. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> [http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071](http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071)  
> public announcement)
> 
> - WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be disclosed)
> 
> * * *
> 
> nginx mailing list  
> [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
> [mailman.nginx.org archive](http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx)

- WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be  
disclosed)  
Are we expecting by this week !

–Tarak
