# Nginx-1.0.10

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889>\
**Category:** NGINX\
**Created:** [November 15, 2011, 10:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889 "2011-11-15T10:43:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![luislavena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/0ea827/32.png) [@luislavena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/luislavena)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2011, 10:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/1 "2011-11-15T10:43:17Z")

</div>

Changes with nginx 1.0.10 15 Nov  
2011

```
*) Bugfix: a segmentation fault might occur in a worker process if
   resolver got a big DNS response.
   Thanks to Ben Hawkes.

*) Bugfix: in cache key calculation if internal MD5 implementation 

```

was  
used; the bug had appeared in 1.0.4.

```
*) Bugfix: the module ngx_http_mp4_module sent incorrect
   "Content-Length" response header line if the "start" argument was
   used.
   Thanks to Piotr S..

```

–  
Igor S.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/3ab097/32.png) [@imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/imixaly4)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2011, 1:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/2 "2011-11-15T13:29:53Z")

</div>

Hi Igor,

It would be nice if you could include tarball checksums in the release  
announcements!

Bruno

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/3ab097/32.png) [@imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/imixaly4)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2011, 1:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/3 "2011-11-15T13:50:54Z")

</div>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:29:04PM +0100, Bruno Prmont wrote:

> Hi Igor,
> 
> It would be nice if you could include tarball checksums in the release  
> announcements!

Is [http://nginx.org/download/nginx-1.0.10.tar.gz.asc](http://nginx.org/download/nginx-1.0.10.tar.gz.asc) not enough ?

–  
Igor S.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/3ab097/32.png) [@imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/imixaly4)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2011, 2:19pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/4 "2011-11-15T14:19:22Z")

</div>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:50:20 Igor S. wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 01:29:04PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> 
> > Hi Igor,
> > 
> > It would be nice if you could include tarball checksums in the release  
> > announcements!
> 
> Is [http://nginx.org/download/nginx-1.0.10.tar.gz.asc](http://nginx.org/download/nginx-1.0.10.tar.gz.asc) not enough ?

It’s useful though not optimal (well, depends on workflow 🙂 ).

When reading announcements happens on one system but downloading  
and compiling happens on a different system it’s easier to verify  
checksums on the build host and have the checksums verified via signed  
e-mail.

Bruno

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/3ab097/32.png) [@imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/imixaly4)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2011, 12:31pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/5 "2011-11-16T12:31:12Z")

</div>

Hello Nginx U.s,  
Just released: Nginx 1.0.10 For Windows [Nginx 1.0.10 for Windows – Kevin Worthington](http://goo.gl/5GcCE) (32-bit and  
64-bit)

These versions are to support legacy users who are already using  
Cygwin based builds of Nginx. Official Windows binaries are at

> **[nginx](http://nginx.org)**

## Thank you, Kevin

Kevin W.  
kworthington ~at] gmail [dot} .C0M~

> **[Kevin Worthington](https://kevinworthington.com/)**
>
> Practical Tech Guides, Troubleshooting, and Insights on the Modern Internet

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/3ab097/32.png) [@imixaly4](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/imixaly4)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2011, 6:58pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/nginx-1-0-10/213889/6 "2011-11-16T18:58:24Z")

</div>

On 15 Nov 2011 13h18 WET, removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid wrote:

It’s quite easy to create a script that downloads the source, the sig  
and verifies it with GPG.

Here’s my take on it:

> **[GitHub - perusio/nginx-get-source: A script that downloads a Nginx source...](https://github.com/perusio/nginx-get-source)**
>
> A script that downloads a Nginx source tarball verifiying its signature - GitHub - perusio/nginx-get-source: A script that downloads a Nginx source tarball verifiying its signature

Feel free to use it or fork it.

— appa