# More fcgi problems on apache\] **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [May 30, 2006, 10:01pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/more-fcgi-problems-on-apache/95384 "2006-05-30T22:01:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![beachguy82](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@beachguy82](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/beachguy82)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2006, 10:01pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/more-fcgi-problems-on-apache/95384/1 "2006-05-30T22:01:02Z")
Sorry if this get listed twice. Evolution hates me today. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Charlie B. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) To: removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid Bcc: Drew Stinnett [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) Subject: Re: [Rails] more fcgi problems on apache Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:43:09 -0400 The decision isn’t mine. I’m just the programmer. This is the first app my company has ever ran that isn’t plain vanilla cgi and the first non perl app. I think the company is going to try out lighty ran behind apache. They aren’t keen on using mongrel quite yet. It’s still a little too new for them. Does the above setup sound good? On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 12:35 -0700, Tom M. wrote: > > 3 days over the weekend. It did however crash today. Does this > > sound like a bad fcgi setup or just a very buggy fcgi/Apache combo? > > * * * > > Rails mailing list > removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid > [http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails](http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails) Charlie B. [http://www.recentrambles.com](http://www.recentrambles.com) Charlie B. Programmer Castle Branch Inc.