# MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (29014)

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/mi5-persecution-no-justice-for-the-victims-of-mi5-29014/123336>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [December 16, 2007, 6:30pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/mi5-persecution-no-justice-for-the-victims-of-mi5-29014/123336 "2007-12-16T18:30:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2007, 6:30pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/mi5-persecution-no-justice-for-the-victims-of-mi5-29014/123336/1 "2007-12-16T18:30:43Z")

</div>

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 11 June, 1999

Harassment in a pub in Clapham, Tuesday lunchtime

Once a month, or once every other month, I meet a Polish friends of mine  
who lives in Clapham North, and sometimes we go to a particular pub near  
where he lives. The last time was some two months ago; I did not have my  
minidisc-walkman with me, and consequently was seriously harassed by  
people MI5 had instructed to harass me, in the pub.

This Tuesday, 8 June 1999, we again went to the same pub for a pre-meal  
drink. This time I did have my minidisc-walkman with me. As you can  
guess,  
we were followed into the pub by a couple of young people (Im getting  
older and older - isnt it funny how the MI5 agents all look young these  
days?). They started talking about my situation, in particular some  
travel  
I had booked the previous day. Unfortunately, they were talking fairly  
quietly, and my minidisc didnt pick up their speech.

MI5s schizophrenic reasoning is that simultaneously I am very important  
and worthy of their acts of persecution, and I am also totally  
unimportant  
and their abuse of me “doesnt matter”. Perhaps they should test their  
agents and managers for obsessive personalities or psychotic features in  
the same way as employees are drug-tested. MI5 might lose their “worst  
cases” employees if some psychological testing were applied to their  
recruitment procedure.

Toothless Watchdogs. What a Surprise.

Recently I have been engaging in communications with two watchdogs, the  
Security Service Tribunal which deals with complaints against the  
security  
service (and always clears MI5 of any wrongdoing), and the Data  
Protection  
Registrar, which is mandated to investigate misuse of personal data held  
on computer.

In a letter to Nick Brooks, Security Service Tribunal secretary, dated  
20  
April, I asked him if the Tribunal, as an allegedly independent body,  
had  
the means to investigate complaints against MI5 other than asking MI5 to  
themselves investigate complaints. To my disappointment, his reply two  
weeks later answered the question only indirectly, in the  
negative. Whatever the reader might think of the merits of the case I  
have  
been putting before you in faxed articles this last year and half, you  
will surely recognise that it is a significant anomaly for the Tribunal  
to  
have no independent means of investigating complaints, particularly  
given  
the view expressed even by previous home secretaries that the security  
services are untrustworthy.

MI5 Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5

In a previous article I detailed the similarities between the current  
MI5  
Persecution in England, and other historical instances of similar  
persecution, notably that by the Nazi Germans in the thirties and  
forties. The Germans persecuted first the mentally ill, the epileptics  
and  
those suffering from schizophrenia, then moved on to racial groups; in  
todays Britain the persecution is again directed at those with mental  
illness, which the British in their cowardice find easier than taking on  
racial groups as the Germans did. But just as in Thirties Germany there  
was no recourse against a malign and omnipotent state, so the MI5 Secret  
Police in the modern British Fascist State allow no justice for their  
victims.

No Recourse Against the Security Services Illegal Harassment

It has become apparent to me over the last nine years just how loaded  
the  
dice are in todays Britain, a fundamentally fascist country which  
masquerades as a democracy. Britain is a democracy in name only; the  
Establishment, the defence and MI5 secret police are always there,  
regardless of which party has been voted into power most recently - and  
from “New Labours” conduct in office one finds it difficult to tell them  
apart from Old Tories, in their crackdowns on the sick and vulnerable in  
society.

In thirties Germany the victims of the Nazi regime had no legal recourse  
against their State oppressors; and in todays Fascist British state, the  
victims of the Establishment and its MI5 Secret Police similarly have no  
recourse against the illegal state-funded and organised oppression.  
There  
is supposed to be a mechanism for dealing with MI5 crimes, in the shape  
of  
the Security Service Tribunal and Commissioner; yet these have never  
found  
favour of a plaintiff. One might as well ask the Nazi SS to investigate  
crimes against epileptics or Jews as ask the Security Service Tribunal  
to  
investigate MI5 crimes against British citizens; it is quite obvious  
what  
the answer is going to be, regardless of what you say to them, and what  
evidence you provide. The Tribunal and Commissioner are a mere  
formality,  
a whitewashing body to give the Secret Services a veneer beneath which  
they hide their shabby criminality.

“Institutional Racism” and Bigotry in the Metropolitan Police

The recent inquiry into the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence found  
clear  
evidence of systematic and deliberate racism in the Metropolitan Police,  
which cannot have surprised anyone. Commissioner Sir Paul Condon  
accepted  
a somewhat lukewarm definition of institutional racism as being  
“unconscious”. In truth, and this truth must surely be obvious to anyone  
who has any familiarity or encountered the great British police, the Met  
has not just “unconscious” racism, but very clearly “conscious” and  
deliberate racism, of the kind that would have done Thirties Germans  
proud. And it is a bastion of such open racism - when many other parts  
of  
society are learning to live in a multicultural environment, the Met is  
still living in the past in its attitude to the minorities.

But in addition to the systematic racism confirmed by the Lawrence  
inquiry, there is also something much more relevant to this case, which  
is  
systematic police bigotry against the physically and mentally disabled,  
which I personally have experienced in my dealings with the police over  
the years. You cannot expect equal treatment if you are mentally  
disabled. I tried to make a complaint to the police in 1995 about the  
harassment I had been subjected to for several years. As soon as they  
found out I had mental illness, they refused to even talk to me. I tried  
again in March 1999; the police made various threats to me, while  
ranting  
about “your paranoid rubbish” in reference to the complaints expressed  
to  
them.

The police refusal to do the job they are employed and paid to do is  
extremely serious, particularly as this case is highly important, indeed  
key to the whole issue of British self-perception at the end of the 20th  
century and the beginning of the 21st century. Britain has lost much in  
the last fifty years - it has lost an empire, it has lost its  
self-respect  
and its identity as a people. If the MI5 persecution finally makes it  
into  
the light and the Security Services are seen for the rather cheap  
bullies  
their behaviour indicates, it will have a massive and harmful effect on  
British self-perception in the new century.

Security Service Tribunal - Blatant Whitewashing

A few weeks ago I spoke on the phone to Nick Brooks, the Secretary of  
the  
Security Service Tribunal, which is supposed to deal with cases of MI5  
transgression. I asked him if the Tribunal had ever found in favour of a  
plaintiff and against the Security Service. He answered that as far as  
he  
knew, it had not.

I also asked Mr Brooks if the Tribunal had any means of investigating  
allegations of criminal activity by MI5, other than asking MI5  
themselves  
if they had engaged in such activity. His rather circuitous written  
reply  
states that the 1989 Security Service Act provides that “it shall be the  
duty of every member of the Service to disclose or give to the Tribunal  
such documents or information as they may require for the purpose of  
enabling them to carry out their functions under this Act”. Which is a  
very round-about way of saying - “No” - the Tribunal has no way of  
investigating MI5 crimes - None At All.

Setting up the S.S. Tribunal, and creating a Security Service  
Commissioner, was really an act of falsehood by the government. It is  
generally recognised that MI5 are out of reach of the normal criminal  
justice system - the police, as we have seen, have no intesot answer to  
the government; in a previous article I quoted Roy Jenkins speaking of  
“a  
secretive atmosphere… secretive vis-a-vis the government as well as  
[enemies]”, and a “lack of frankness” from MI5.

If the government wanted to, it could reform the secret services and  
ensure they acted in conformance with the laws which have been enacted  
for  
them in the last ten years. But apparently the present government does  
not  
see any need to ensure security service compliance with the law. As  
noted  
above, the regulatory machinery for MI5 is deliberately weak; the  
Tribunal  
has no independent means of investigation, and it is simply a waste of  
time complaining to the Tribunal or Commissioner.

Every so often, fresh revelations come to light of secret service  
transgressions. We have heard from Shayler that MI5 bugged Jack Straw  
and  
Peter Mandelson; we have heard from Peter Wright that MI5 plotted to see  
Wilson ejected from office; yet so closed is the system of government  
that  
the law is never enforced against MI5 when they “bug and burgle”  
everyone  
from politicians to ordinary citizens.

No Justice from the Legal System, either

Britain has a civil and criminal justice system which effectively limits  
many complaints from being heard. For a civil complaint to be brought  
before a court, you need a solicitor willing to act on your  
behalf. Supposedly it is possible to represent yourself as a  
Litigant-in-Pthe basis of being “frivolous and vexatious” or “disclosing  
no cause for action in law”. This is exactly what happened to me in 1997  
when I twice tried to take the BBC to court for spying on me in my  
living  
room at home; my case was twice struck out, and on the second occasion  
an  
order was made against me that I could not bring further civil  
litigation  
against the BBC without leave of the court.

As the reader can guess it is quite impossible for a person with  
schizophrenia, who complains about the secret services and media  
interfering in his life, to find a solicitor willing to represent him in  
legal action against the persecutors. I have quite a lot of evidence of  
the continuing persecution which I have posted on the website, even if  
the  
evidence is quite tentative and perhaps open to varying  
interpretations. But I have tried several firms of solicitors; some of  
them have acted unprofessionally and abused me; all of them have refused  
to represent me. My psychiatrist gave me the name of the firm of Bindman  
and Partners in central London, and I have approached them twice. On  
each  
occasion they refused to accept my instructions. Plainly the problem  
with  
Bindmans, which they have admitted, is their bigotry against mentally  
disabled people; yet this is not just something that is wrong with  
Bindmans, it is something that is wrong with the legal system as a  
whole,  
since the legal system necessitates finding a solicitor willing to  
represent you in order to bring a case to court, but it does not have a  
mechanism for providing a lawyer in the case where no solicitor is  
willing  
to take on your case. So the British legal system is such as to prevent  
cases such as mine from ever receiving an airing in a court.

So much for the civil courts. But the criminal justice system is no  
better. Two years ago the Protection from Harassment Act came into  
force. But again, while the Act is all very well on paper, in practice  
it  
is unenforceable in my case, since it would require Police action to see  
the law implemented, and if the police cannot even be trusted to conduct  
a  
murder investigation competently (in the Lawrence case), then what  
chance  
is there of their investigating complaints against the Security  
Service? Of course, it would be possible for me to personally issue  
proceedings through a private prosecution either against MI5 themselves,  
or against one or more of their media tools; but here we see the same  
problems as with the civil courts, because first of all I would have to  
find a lawyer willing to act on my behalf. Litigants-in-person do exist  
in  
the criminal courts, but the Attorney General can bring such a  
prosecution  
to an end by taking it over and entering a plea of “nolle prossequi”;  
and  
I suspect that if I were to bring a private prosecution against either  
MI5  
or one of their media tools, then this is exactly what would happen.

So much for British justice. But if anything the wrongs that have been  
perpetrated on me by the British justice system are quite mild to what  
others have suffered. Others have been wrongly convicted based on police  
evasions and lies, and spent many years in jail based on false charges.  
I  
should count myself lucky that despite the best efforts of the MI5  
secret  
police, I have not acquired any criminal charges or convictions; which  
shows that for all their resources and influence, and the clear  
imperfections in the British legal system, there are still limits on how  
much subversion MI5 can achieve.

The latest in a long line of injustices

A comment I heard during the recent scandal of the police mishandling of  
the Lawrence murder investigation is that “its not as if the police  
themselves murdered him”. This is not a particularly wise statement to  
make about the case, since it could be argued that the four alleged  
murderers were aided in their crime by the expectation that the police  
would deliberately botch the investigation - which of course is exactly  
what the police did.

But in my case, this would be a completely inaccurate thing to say -  
since  
the MI5 secret-police have expressly been trying to nine years now to  
see  
an end put to my life, either by having me incarcerated and my liberty  
ended, or by forcing self-termination on me. It is exactly as if the  
secret police “themselves murdered [me]”, since that is what their aim  
is  
in their campaign against me.

The public has heard of instances of police mishandling of cases, of  
police manufacturing evidence, lying in court, extracting false  
confessions to clear up crimes, et cetera. Various instances of  
extra-legal activity by the secret services have also come to light in  
the  
last few years. The unhappy truth is that what MI5 have been doing to me  
for the last nine years is really nothing out of the ordinary for them.  
To  
me it seems unbelievable that this sort of systematic campaign of  
harassment, which thousands and thousands of people in this country and  
abroad are well aware of, could exist for such a long period of time  
with  
the media maintaining “omerta”. But my case is not the first such  
instance  
of persecution by the “British secret police”, and judging by the lack  
of  
any real controls on MI5, I very much doubt it will be the last.

29014
