# Manuals.rubyonrails.com down AGAIN!

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [January 2, 2007, 2:39pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952 "2007-01-02T14:39:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/e47774/32.png) [@quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/quangn)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 2:39pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952/1 "2007-01-02T14:39:37Z")

</div>

Anyone have any information on this? As others have said in past  
threads, I would be more than willing to host a mirror for the site. In  
fact, barring any copyright notices I find on the site, next time it’s  
up I’m going to rip it for my own personal benefit, and I may as well  
put it up as a mirror in static HTML format.

Jason

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/e47774/32.png) [@quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/quangn)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 4:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952/2 "2007-01-02T16:15:52Z")

</div>

On 1/2/07, Jason N. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> next time it’s  
> up I’m going to rip it for my own personal benefit

You could build the docs from source if you don’t want to wait for the  
site to come back up.

#1 - create a dummy rails project, e.g. “rails-1\_2-rc-apidoc”  
#2 - change directories, e.g. “cd rails-1\_2-rc-apidoc”  
#3 - check out the rails source into that project, e.g. “svn co  
[http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/branches/1-2-pre-release/](http://dev.rubyonrails.org/svn/rails/branches/1-2-pre-release/)  
vendor/rails”  
#4 - generate the api docs, “rake doc:rerails”  
#5 - point your browser at doc/api/index.html

If you prefer, use “stable” rather than the “1-2-pre-release” branch.

Isak

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/e47774/32.png) [@quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/quangn)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 4:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952/3 "2007-01-02T16:23:54Z")

</div>

Manuals are different than the API; the API docs are available at  
[http://api.rubyonrails.org/](http://api.rubyonrails.org/) but the manuals are…well…manuals.  
Narrative texts that explain how to do something such as routing or  
deployment.

And again, I, too, can host or chip in to pay for a mirror.

–Jeremy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/e47774/32.png) [@quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/quangn)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 4:34pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952/4 "2007-01-02T16:34:00Z")

</div>

On 1/2/07, Jeremy McAnally [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> Manuals are different than the API; the API docs are available at  
> [http://api.rubyonrails.org/](http://api.rubyonrails.org/) but the manuals are…well…manuals.  
> Narrative texts that explain how to do something such as routing or  
> deployment.

Of course. Time to call it a day, I guess… 🙂

Isak

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/e47774/32.png) [@quangn](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/quangn)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2007, 4:44pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/manuals-rubyonrails-com-down-again/80952/5 "2007-01-02T16:44:01Z")

</div>

Actually, I don’t really need any of the Rails manuals, specifically.  
What I was looking for last week was the Capistrano manual, which is not  
available anywhere else AFAIK. I don’t recall if there’s anything else  
on the site that I’ve needed recently, but the Capistrano thing was  
really really annoying.
