# Linux install of RR

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [December 26, 2005, 1:07am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088 "2005-12-26T01:07:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2005, 1:07am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/1 "2005-12-26T01:07:57Z")

</div>

Hi. I’ve installed ruby, gems, rails into a user directory according to  
the  
installation instructions (for linux). I haven’t setup any path  
information  
nor setup any symlinks or any compilation options. When I try rails, I  
find  
that the system accesses controllers but that the corresponding views  
are  
not displayed. I wonder if there is something that I forgot to  
configure  
that might be causing this. Sincerely, Barney T…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2005, 2:02am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/2 "2005-12-26T02:02:00Z")

</div>

Hi Barney,

Could you share a little more information about your situation, like  
which  
Linux distro you’re using, how you generated your Rails app, and how  
you’re  
running it?

For example, did you use script/generate or just create the controllers  
by  
hand, and which server are you using - Apache, Webbrick, lighttp?

cheers

On Monday 26 December 2005 9:07 am, Barney T. wrote:

> Hi. I’ve installed ruby, gems, rails into a user directory according to  
> the installation instructions (for linux). I haven’t setup any path  
> information nor setup any symlinks or any compilation options. When I try  
> rails, I find that the system accesses controllers but that the  
> corresponding views are not displayed. I wonder if there is something that  
> I forgot to configure that might be causing this. Sincerely, Barney T…

–

Mark B.  
Easy Schedule Management  
[http://easy-online-schedule.com](http://easy-online-schedule.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2005, 2:20am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/3 "2005-12-26T02:20:04Z")

</div>

Barney,

I’ve installed RoR under SuSE Linux. You will need a database. I used  
LAMPP (XAMPP) to do my phpMyAdmin. It made things sweet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2005, 6:29am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/4 "2005-12-26T06:29:22Z")

</div>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----  
Hash: SHA1

Barney T. wrote:

> Hi. I’ve installed ruby, gems, rails into a user directory according to  
> the installation instructions (for linux). I haven’t setup any path  
> information nor setup any symlinks or any compilation options. When I  
> try rails, I find that the system accesses controllers but that the  
> corresponding views are not displayed. I wonder if there is something  
> that I forgot to configure that might be causing this. Sincerely,  
> Barney T…

Barney,

I’ve successfully installed Ruby and Rails on Fedora FC3/FC4 (via yum)  
and Kubuntu Linux (via apt-get) using pre-compiled packages from the  
public repositories. It’s usually much easier to do it that way, no  
worries about paths and environments and where to put stuff. Then I  
download gems, build and install it as root and then gem install rails.  
The only thing I do after that is download native mysql, which usually  
requires extra libraries to compile and some flags being set for paths.

What distribution and what instructions have you been following ? The  
Prag Prog Agile Web book ?

Yan  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----  
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)  
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - [http://enigmail.mozdev.org](http://enigmail.mozdev.org)

iD8DBQFDr370rgZ25EQKEI0RAkg1AJ9sU+lMqehNalMSCEuAh8yMH7I2VACdE0Nc  
KkArBhzPO8ac/XiNlVHugRM=  
=FsZh  
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2005, 7:23pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/5 "2005-12-26T19:23:51Z")

</div>

What kind of views you generated? I’m using Rails on Suse 9.3, with  
Postgresql, and I had the same problem once. The in my case was that  
the database engine was not running right… Once I fixed that I could  
see the views.

Barney T. wrote:

> Hi. I’ve installed ruby, gems, rails into a user directory according to  
> the  
> installation instructions (for linux). I haven’t setup any path  
> information  
> nor setup any symlinks or any compilation options. When I try rails, I  
> find  
> that the system accesses controllers but that the corresponding views  
> are  
> not displayed. I wonder if there is something that I forgot to  
> configure  
> that might be causing this. Sincerely, Barney T…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Barney\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Barney_T)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2005, 3:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/linux-install-of-rr/51088/6 "2005-12-31T15:46:15Z")

</div>

Please note that the rails literature gets updated frequently.  
The documentation and latest source versions often contain fixes to  
recent issues.  
The issue here was that the documentation suggested using an older  
version of ruby.  
And it just so happened that the newest stable version of ruby was the  
version that was really needed.

Good luck!
