# Job offers/positions and searching for Ruby developers

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [May 27, 2008, 7:22pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788 "2008-05-27T19:22:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2008, 7:22pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/1 "2008-05-27T19:22:04Z")

</div>

I wanted to ask the more senior members of the group whether job  
postings and the like are frowned-upon here. It’s just a little  
difficult to find Ruby programmers in a general job searching.

Alternatively, if anyone knows of some good sites to hire full-time on-  
site RoR developers, I would appreciate any advice. Difficulty: small  
company, don’t want to pay to trawl CareerBuilder and other such sites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2008, 7:30pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/2 "2008-05-27T19:30:54Z")

</div>

On 27 May 2008, at 18:21, Clever N. wrote:

> I wanted to ask the more senior members of the group whether job  
> postings and the like are frowned-upon here. It’s just a little  
> difficult to find Ruby programmers in a general job searching.

As far as I’m concerned, go ahead ! (within reason obviously; a  
recruitment agency posting the same message everyday would be over the  
top).  
No idea how good it is for that, but workingwithrails allows users to  
flag themselves as ‘available for hire’

Fred

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2008, 11:59pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/3 "2008-05-27T23:59:06Z")

</div>

> **[RubyNow: Ruby Jobs | Niche Ruby on Rails Jobs Board](https://jobs.rubynow.com/)**
>
> Find Ruby on Rails developers. Post Ruby jobs into the inboxes of active Rails developers today. RubyNow: the trusted Ruby Jobs board since 2005.

[http://railspays.com/](http://railspays.com/) (UK)  
[http://jobs.37signals.com/](http://jobs.37signals.com/)

that’s where I subscribe for job announcements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 2:15am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/4 "2008-05-28T02:15:48Z")

</div>

Clever N. wrote:

> I wanted to ask the more senior members of the group whether job  
> postings and the like are frowned-upon here. It’s just a little  
> difficult to find Ruby programmers in a general job searching.
> 
> Alternatively, if anyone knows of some good sites to hire full-time on-  
> site RoR developers, I would appreciate any advice. Difficulty: small  
> company, don’t want to pay to trawl CareerBuilder and other such sites.

While there are certainly more of us than there were a couple of years  
ago, I think the numbers of Rails developers is still quite small  
compared to something like .Net or Flash or the like. I think that  
relative “scarcity” coupled with your belief that they need to be  
on-site is the root of your difficulty.

Here’s to hoping that more and more hiring managers come to realize that  
programmers are typically not very good looking human beings; why do you  
want to look at them? To require them to show up in your building, in  
your city, is not good for them, and not good for you, and not good for  
the pretty people you have sitting around doing marketing and being  
receptionists, etc. 🙂

Physical togetherness does not promote better software. Not long ago I  
was part of a rag-tag group of developers operating well as a team  
despite locations in four different time zones around the planet.

Please do yourself a favor and look into building a geographically  
dispersed but technologically connected group of development talent.  
We’re out here, and we’re easy to find, if you’re not limiting your  
search to one city.

cheers,  
jp

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 2:25am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/5 "2008-05-28T02:25:07Z")

</div>

Jeff P. wrote:

> programmers are typically not very good looking human beings; why do you  
> want to look at them?

Darn, I thought one of the pros of Ruby was better looking programmers.

[http://flickr.com/photos/46457493@N00/230535210/](http://flickr.com/photos/46457493@N00/230535210/)

Tor Erik

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2008, 4:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/6 "2008-05-28T16:50:33Z")

</div>

On May 27, 8:15 pm, Jeff P. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
wrote:

> While there are certainly more of us than there were a couple of years  
> ago, I think the numbers of Rails developers is still quite small  
> compared to something like .Net or Flash or the like. I think that  
> relative “scarcity” coupled with your belief that they need to be  
> on-site is the root of your difficulty.

It is not a belief in the ideological sense, it is a necessity of our  
development model and our financial means, and the CEO’s wishes.

> Here’s to hoping that more and more hiring managers come to realize that  
> programmers are typically not very good looking human beings; why do you  
> want to look at them?

Accountability, personal relationships, and easier flow of ideas.

> Physical togetherness does not promote better software. Not long ago I  
> was part of a rag-tag group of developers operating well as a team  
> despite locations in four different time zones around the planet.

Not necessarily. However, pair programming, on-the-spot code reviews,  
and other programming practices I engage in pretty much necessitate  
it. Plus, it’s much easier if you are an actual programmer with no  
management above you to handle a single person in real-time than  
spending 90% of your time reviewing other’s work and simply acting as  
bookkeeper and specification clarifier (which is what I turned into,  
except for a critical part of the code no one outside the company was  
allowed to touch). I worked with a 10-person Ukrainian team before,  
and the code was OK, but at the end of it, we became dependent on them  
because we had no in-house programmers, and bad things ensued.

> Please do yourself a favor and look into building a geographically  
> dispersed but technologically connected group of development talent.  
> We’re out here, and we’re easy to find, if you’re not limiting your  
> search to one city.

I have nothing against what you are saying. But when you don’t have  
any venture capital (i.e. the company has to _gasp_ actually earn what  
it pays out every month), it’s tough to spend twice the money on a  
contract basis than for an in-house person.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/0ea827/32.png) [@Clever\_N](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Clever_N)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2008, 8:38am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/job-offers-positions-and-searching-for-ruby-developers/138788/7 "2008-05-29T08:38:15Z")

</div>

Clever N. wrote:  
…

> I have nothing against what you are saying. But when you don’t have  
> any venture capital (i.e. the company has to _gasp_ actually earn what  
> it pays out every month), it’s tough to spend twice the money on a  
> contract basis than for an in-house person.

Ok, fair enough. Sounds like larger projects than I typically work on  
for one thing.

> Accountability, personal relationships, and easier flow of ideas.  
> No sale on this, I’m afraid. It simply isn’t so.

Accountability: If you have to watch them that close they aren’t worth  
hiring in the first place. No amount of watching will make a weenie  
work hard. At best you can get them to fake it and blow smoke up your  
backside.

Relationships: Ten emails a day and an occasional phone call are all  
that’s needed for this.

Easier flow of ideas: see above.

Anyway, I respect your decision to keep it in house, I just hope it gets  
more common for people with medium to small developments to go the  
telecommute route. If ever there were a time and a technology and an  
endeavor where it makes sense, this is it.

cheers,  
jp
