# Is ruby 1.9.1 supported by Rails 2.3.0?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [March 24, 2009, 11:19am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722 "2009-03-24T11:19:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/jarl)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 11:19am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722/1 "2009-03-24T11:19:35Z")

</div>

Hi.

It seems like many people have had success using rails 2.3.0 with ruby  
1.9.1. And as far as I know one of the goals of rails 2.3.0 was to  
support ruby 1.9.1.

But on [http://rubyonrails.org/download](http://rubyonrails.org/download), ruby 1.8.x is still  
recomended and ruby 1.9.1 is not even mentioned. Is that because the  
webpage has not been updated yet, or is it because rails 2.3.0 still  
does not work well on ruby 1.9.1?

Jarl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/jarl)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 12:15pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722/2 "2009-03-24T12:15:15Z")

</div>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Jarl F. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> does not work well on ruby 1.9.1?
> 
> Jarl

Jarl, the current release version of Rails is 2.3.2. Thus, you might to  
take a look at the following:

> **[Ruby on Rails 2.3 Release Notes — Ruby on Rails Guides](https://guides.rubyonrails.org/2_3_release_notes.html#ruby-191-support)**
>
> Ruby on Rails 2.3 Release NotesRails 2.3 delivers a variety of new and improved features, including pervasive Rack integration, refreshed support for Rails Engines, nested transactions for Active Record, dynamic and default scopes, unified rendering,...

Next, if your rails application(s) requires certain gems and/or plugins,  
then you  
might want to take a look at the following:

> **[OPE体育下载, OPE体育电竞, 大辛辛那提OPE体育电竞](http://www.isitruby19.com/)**
>
> 世界事务理事会, 501 (c) 3非盈利, 是连接世界和美国最具活力的地区之一的桥梁吗. 通过OPE体育下载, 国际交流, 以及文化意识倡议, 该委员会加强了辛辛那提和北肯塔基州的国际身份，并让个人参与外交事务.

Lastly, I have been using Ruby 1.9.1 and 2.3.x for several weeks without  
any  
major issues.

Good luck,

-Conrad

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/jarl)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 2:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722/3 "2009-03-24T14:29:04Z")

</div>

Conrad T. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) writes:

> Lastly, I have been using Ruby 1.9.1 and 2.3.x for several weeks without any  
> major issues.

Thanks a lot for the info.

Jarl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@jarl](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/jarl)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2009, 9:07pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-ruby-1-9-1-supported-by-rails-2-3-0/163722/4 "2009-03-24T21:07:35Z")

</div>

Jarl F. wrote:

> Conrad T. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) writes:
> 
> > Lastly, I have been using Ruby 1.9.1 and 2.3.x for several weeks without any  
> > major issues.

It might also be worth mentioning that a full transition to Ruby 1.9.1  
might still take a little time in order to make sure that all the gems  
and plugins commonly used in Rails applications work well under Ruby  
1.9.1.