# Is anyone using AAF trunk? **URL:** \ **Category:** Ferret\ **Created:** [February 1, 2008, 11:12pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-anyone-using-aaf-trunk/127870 "2008-02-01T23:12:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![johnnybutler7](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/8491ac/32.png) [@johnnybutler7](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/johnnybutler7)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2008, 11:12pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-anyone-using-aaf-trunk/127870/1 "2008-02-01T23:12:07Z")
My project is currently using AAF 0.4.3. Trunk has some compelling features, but my project is going live on Monday and I am apprehensive about switching. Is anyone using trunk in a relatively high-volume context? (A low and vague standard for evaluating production suitability, I know, but better than nothing). Thanks, John ---
**Author:** ![johnnybutler7](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/8491ac/32.png) [@johnnybutler7](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/johnnybutler7)\ **Post date:** [February 2, 2008, 4:16pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/is-anyone-using-aaf-trunk/127870/2 "2008-02-02T16:16:11Z")
Hi! Not sure about hogh volume usage, but I’m using aaf trunk in a project right now, so chances are good I’ll notice bugs quite early. Having that said, if I was you I wouldn’t do an update just before launch if it wasn’t absolutely necessary. Why not do the update after launch and give it some more testing until the next time you do a deployment? Cheers, Jens PS: I’m going through Trac right now and plan to release 0.4.4 in a week or so. On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:02:41PM -0500, John B. wrote: > Ferret-talk mailing list > removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid > [http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk](http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk) – Jens Krämer [http://www.jkraemer.net/](http://www.jkraemer.net/) - Blog [http://www.omdb.org/](http://www.omdb.org/) - The new free film database