# Hiding Ruby tasks in Windows display

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/hiding-ruby-tasks-in-windows-display/173562>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [August 11, 2009, 1:59pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/hiding-ruby-tasks-in-windows-display/173562 "2009-08-11T13:59:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e79b87/32.png) [@bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/bodikp)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2009, 1:59pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/hiding-ruby-tasks-in-windows-display/173562/1 "2009-08-11T13:59:16Z")

</div>

Hi,  
I’ve got a PC acting as a server that only runs Ruby scripts, using the  
Windows task scheduler. If I sit down at that PC I’m constantly  
bombarded by command shells opening and closing as these scripts fire  
off and on. In DOS and Windows there are ways to hide windows from  
displaying. Is there any way to hide window display in Ruby?  
Thanks,  
Peter

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e79b87/32.png) [@bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/bodikp)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2009, 2:08pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/hiding-ruby-tasks-in-windows-display/173562/2 "2009-08-11T14:08:10Z")

</div>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Peter B.[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> 

I hope memory serves correctly but is there not a rubyw.exe that  
avoids that behavior?  
HTH  
Robert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e79b87/32.png) [@bodikp](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/bodikp)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2009, 2:16pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/hiding-ruby-tasks-in-windows-display/173562/3 "2009-08-11T14:16:45Z")

</div>

Robert D. wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Peter B.[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:
> 
> > 
> 
> I hope memory serves correctly but is there not a rubyw.exe that  
> avoids that behavior?  
> HTH  
> Robert

Thanks, Robert. I’ve found out about rubyw in the pickaxe book and I’ll  
investigate further. It sounds perfect for me.
