# Has\_many relationship able to be placed on one to others? **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [October 23, 2008, 10:14am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592 "2008-10-23T10:14:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mrkohrea)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2008, 10:14am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592/1 "2008-10-23T10:14:57Z")
It’s time for me to go to bed… but perhaps I’ll wake up to a bit of good advice. I have 3 tables: registrations cars motorcycles I am trying to define the registration object in this way: has\_many :cars has\_many :motorcycles Then for the cars and motorcycles I’m saying belongs\_to :registration Something is quite wrong here. How should I be relating these? I read this tutorial: [http://railsguides.phusion.nl/activerecord/association\_basics.html](http://railsguides.phusion.nl/activerecord/association_basics.html) I keep referencing back to this, but I cannot find a relationship that fits. I’m sure I’m not understanding something properly about how relationships should work. I just can’t wrap my head around the “right way” to do things when setting up relationships. Frustrating. Good night all. ---
**Author:** ![mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mrkohrea)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2008, 11:36am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592/2 "2008-10-23T11:36:04Z")
hmmm, you don’t give enough information. What’s the registration about? Is this for some kind of car rental service? The way you describe it, a car could only belong to a single registration. Another thing missing is the customer who makes the registration. If it’s like a car rental, then the registration should be polymorphic and either belong to a car or motorcycle. registration: belongs\_to :registrateable, :polymorphic =\> true belongs\_to :customer # it needs a registrateable\_id column in which you store the car or motorcycle id # and a registrateable\_type column in which Rails stores the class Can you say registrateable? I’m not native english, maybe there is a better word? registerable? Cars and motorcycles each get: has\_many :registrations, :as =\> :registrateable This way you could get as many links between customers and cars as you want. ---
**Author:** ![mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mrkohrea)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2008, 10:43pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592/3 "2008-10-23T22:43:47Z")
> hmmm, you don’t give enough information. > What’s the registration about? > Is this for some kind of car rental service? I sure didn’t. 3:30am was late for me. 🙂 It is a warranty registration where many different products need to be registered. Each product shares some of the same characteristics, date\_registered, dealer\_purchased\_from, etc… those are kept in the registrations table. But each has it’s own unique qualities that we need to track. Perhaps a serial\_number and model\_number and power\_pack\_sn for one product. The other might have a serial\_number and a blade\_sn, for instance. > # it needs a registrateable\_id column in which you store the car or > > motorcycle id > > # and a registrateable\_type column in which Rails stores the class > > Can you say registrateable? I’m not native english, maybe there is > a better word? registerable? > Registerable is in fact a word. 🙂 > Cars and motorcycles each get: > has\_many :registrations, :as =\> :registrateable > > This way you could get as many links between customers and cars as you > want. I don’t think this relationship would work. Because we are dealing with serialized inventory. So product A is really an assembly that consists of several different serialized parts and can only be registered once to 1 customer. Product B is also an assembly that consists of several different serialized parts that can only be registered to a single customer. The customer can have many different products all with unique registrations. Does that help? ---
**Author:** ![mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mrkohrea)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2008, 8:30am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592/4 "2008-10-24T08:30:20Z")
Michael K. wrote: > I don’t think this relationship would work. Because we are dealing > with serialized inventory. So product A is really an assembly that > consists of several different serialized parts and can only be > registered once to 1 customer. Product B is also an assembly that > consists of several different serialized parts that can only be > registered to a single customer. The customer can have many different > products all with unique registrations. Does that help? Shows what I know… nothing. I have been struggling with this for the past few hours (slow learner?), but upon further review I believe this is exactly what I need. I have built the relationships, but now I am trying to find examples on how I would setup the controller for each product to handle the registration. I’ll post again when I know more, but thanks for this. I believe it is precisely the direction I should be going. ---
**Author:** ![mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@mrkohrea](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mrkohrea)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2008, 11:03am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/has-many-relationship-able-to-be-placed-on-one-to-others/151592/5 "2008-10-24T11:03:09Z")
Bed time again. Strange how hyper-focused I can be at night. I’ve been working off of a post to get me going on understanding how to implement in Rails these polymorphic associations. [http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=5882](http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=5882) I also found this: > **[Insight: Medical Device Software Articles and Resources](https://orthogonal.io/insights/)** > > Orthogonal provides timely news, literature reviews, articles, white papers, and commentary for a medical device manufacturing audience. Looks promising, but at this level of abstraction I have trouble understanding. I’m afraid I’m trying to run before I can walk.