# GR 3.7.3 vs. gqrx? **URL:** \ **Category:** GNU Radio\ **Created:** [November 14, 2013, 2:56pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/gr-3-7-3-vs-gqrx/237464 "2013-11-14T14:56:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Detlef\_R](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/58f4c7/32.png) [@Detlef\_R](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Detlef_R)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2013, 2:56pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/gr-3-7-3-vs-gqrx/237464/1 "2013-11-14T14:56:39Z")
Hi, It seems to me that gqrx cries for libgnuradio-runtime-3.7.2git.so.0.0.0, but latest GR brings 3.7.3 into the system. Did I miss smth., or are the projects just not yet “in sync”? Ralph, dk5ras. – Ralph A. Schmid Mondstr. 10 90762 Frth +49-171-3631223 removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid [http://www.bclog.de/](http://www.bclog.de/) ---
**Author:** ![Ralph\_ASSchmidS\_dk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@Ralph\_ASSchmidS\_dk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ralph_ASSchmidS_dk)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2013, 3:03pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/gr-3-7-3-vs-gqrx/237464/2 "2013-11-14T15:03:05Z")
Hi, > It seems to me that gqrx cries for libgnuradio-runtime-3.7.2git.so.0.0.0, > but latest GR brings 3.7.3 into the system. Did I miss smth., or are the > projects just not yet “in sync”? Well, did you rebuild everything after updating GR ? (that includes any GR based stuff, so gr-osmosdr, gr-iqbal (if installed), gqrx …) Cheers, ``` Sylvain ``` ---
**Author:** ![Ralph\_ASSchmidS\_dk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@Ralph\_ASSchmidS\_dk](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Ralph_ASSchmidS_dk)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2013, 3:11pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/gr-3-7-3-vs-gqrx/237464/3 "2013-11-14T15:11:17Z")
> Well, did you rebuild everything after updating GR ? > > (that includes any GR based stuff, so gr-osmosdr, gr-iqbal (if installed), gqrx > …) Aaaaah, I forgot gr-iqbal! All the other stuff I updated and rebuilt, just not this one. Now it looks better, it only complains about the missing HW that really is not there 🙂 Will try later if my bladeRF is recognized, but I expect so. > Cheers, > > ``` > Sylvain > > ``` Thanks a lot! Ralph.