# Framework/templating language performance: Ruby vs. Rack vs. Sinatra and ERB vs. Builder vs. HAML

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/framework-templating-language-performance-ruby-vs-rack-vs-sinatra-and-erb-vs-builder-vs-haml/172050>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [July 13, 2009, 9:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/framework-templating-language-performance-ruby-vs-rack-vs-sinatra-and-erb-vs-builder-vs-haml/172050 "2009-07-13T21:50:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rob\_Cameron](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/838e76/32.png) [@Rob\_Cameron](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Rob_Cameron)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2009, 9:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/framework-templating-language-performance-ruby-vs-rack-vs-sinatra-and-erb-vs-builder-vs-haml/172050/1 "2009-07-13T21:50:56Z")

</div>

For those interested in the nitty gritty of performance, I just posted  
part 1 of my Ultimate Ruby Performance test: Ruby vs. Rack vs.  
Sinatra each running ERB, Builder, HAML and plain HTML.  
[http://www.ridingtheclutch.com/2009/07/13/the-ultimate-ruby-performance-test-part-1.html](http://www.ridingtheclutch.com/2009/07/13/the-ultimate-ruby-performance-test-part-1.html)