# Firebrigade\_api 1.0.0 Released **URL:** \ **Category:** Ruby\ **Created:** [January 31, 2007, 11:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995 "2007-01-31T11:44:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [January 31, 2007, 11:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/1 "2007-01-31T11:44:53Z")
firebrigade\_api version 1.0.0 has been released! [http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/firebrigade\_api](http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/firebrigade_api) == DESCRIPTION An API wrapper for [http://firebrigade.seattlerb.org](http://firebrigade.seattlerb.org) == FEATURES/PROBLEMS Changes: == 1.0.0 / 2007-01-30 - Birthday! - Ruby interface to [http://firebrigade.seattlerb.org](http://firebrigade.seattlerb.org) - User-friendly cache for implementing Tinderbox ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [January 31, 2007, 11:44am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/2 "2007-01-31T11:44:53Z")
On Jan 31, 2007, at 01:12, Eric H. wrote: > firebrigade\_api version 1.0.0 has been released! Oops! I forgot to bump the rc-rest version up to 2.2.1. If you’re missing RCRest::CommunicationError, please upgrade. ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [January 31, 2007, 8:18pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/3 "2007-01-31T20:18:58Z")
On Jan 31, 2007, at 09:56, Mat S. wrote: > $ sudo gem install rc-rest --version 2.2.1 > ERROR: While executing gem … (Gem::GemNotFoundException) > Could not find rc-rest (= 2.2.1) in any repository > > I just modified gem\_tinderbox.rb for the time being to use > RCRest::Error instead. I’m guessing it’s just a propagation issue. It was a problem with the gem indexer, and moving rc-rest over to seattlerb. All patched up now. > Nice work, Eric! Thanks. > Anyone else feel like Ruby is blazing ahead of other languages in > terms of code quality? 🙂 Not with that much red in the pie chart 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [January 31, 2007, 6:56pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/4 "2007-01-31T18:56:49Z")
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Eric H. wrote: > On Jan 31, 2007, at 01:12, Eric H. wrote: > > > firebrigade\_api version 1.0.0 has been released! > > Oops! I forgot to bump the rc-rest version up to 2.2.1. If you’re > missing RCRest::CommunicationError, please upgrade. This is really awesome stuff. But sadly, I can’t seem to get rc-rest 2.2.1 $ sudo gem install rc-rest --version 2.2.1 ERROR: While executing gem … (Gem::GemNotFoundException) Could not find rc-rest (= 2.2.1) in any repository I just modified gem\_tinderbox.rb for the time being to use RCRest::Error instead. I’m guessing it’s just a propagation issue. Nice work, Eric! Anyone else feel like Ruby is blazing ahead of other languages in terms of code quality? 🙂 -Mat ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2007, 2:15am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/5 "2007-02-01T02:15:27Z")
Eric H. wrote: > On Jan 31, 2007, at 09:56, Mat S. wrote: > > > Anyone else feel like Ruby is blazing ahead of other languages in > > terms of code quality? 🙂 > > Not with that much red in the pie chart 🙂 > > You know, I’d be interested to see the rcov stats… ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2007, 2:57am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/6 "2007-02-01T02:57:29Z")
On Jan 31, 2007, at 17:14, Devin M. wrote: > Eric H. wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2007, at 09:56, Mat S. wrote: > > > > > Anyone else feel like Ruby is blazing ahead of other languages > > > in terms of code quality? 🙂 > > > Not with that much red in the pie chart 🙂 > > > You know, I’d be interested to see the rcov stats… There’s no reason the Firebrigade stack couldn’t support additional tinderboxes such as an rcov tinderbox. (I’m open to the idea, too.) ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2007, 1:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/7 "2007-02-01T13:46:16Z")
On Jan 31, 8:57 pm, Eric H. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote: > tinderboxes such as an rcov tinderbox. (I’m open to the idea, too.) > Nice stuff Eric. How does one test a local gem with tinderbox? I’d like to run it locally to debug a few gems, but the documentation on this is a bit ‘sparse’. \_Kevin ---
**Author:** ![miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@miracleofmagick](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/miracleofmagick)\ **Post date:** [February 1, 2007, 8:00pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/firebrigade-api-1-0-0-released/83995/8 "2007-02-01T20:00:51Z")
On Feb 1, 2007, at 04:45, \_Kevin wrote: > > tinderboxes such as an rcov tinderbox. (I’m open to the idea, too.) > > Nice stuff Eric. > > How does one test a local gem with tinderbox? run tinderbox\_gem\_build with the gem name and the version. I think it picks up local gems, but I don’t recall. (If not, file a bug on the seattlerb tracker.) > I’d like to run it locally to debug a few gems, but the documentation > on this is a bit ‘sparse’. I’ll add the names and a brief description of the two command-line tools to the Tinderbox RDoc.