# Finer grained control on caching

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/finer-grained-control-on-caching/213614>\
**Category:** NGINX\
**Created:** [November 7, 2011, 10:35am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/finer-grained-control-on-caching/213614 "2011-11-07T10:35:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dubstep](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/cdc98d/32.png) [@dubstep](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/dubstep)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2011, 10:35am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/finer-grained-control-on-caching/213614/1 "2011-11-07T10:35:13Z")

</div>

I posted and idea last week to Ideas and Feature Requests: “Finer  
grained control on caching” ([Finer grained control on caching](http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?10,217748)),  
but since I’m new to this forum/mailing list I have no idea if anybody  
saw this.

I want to find out if this is an acceptable feature request and if  
anybody else sees the benefits of this.

Short summary:  
Add a new directive fastcgi\_cache\_key\_suffix  
Construct the caching filename like this md5(fastcgi\_cache\_key) . ‘\_’ .  
fastcgi\_cache\_key\_suffix

Posted at Nginx Forum:

> **[Finer grained control on caching](https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,217909,217909#msg-217909)**
>
> I posted and idea last week to Ideas and Feature Requests: "Finer grained control on caching" (http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?10,217748), but since I'm new to this forum/mailing list I have no idea if anybody saw this. I want to find out...
