# Enterprise Ruby Studio

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [July 12, 2006, 2:20am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026 "2006-07-12T02:20:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2006, 2:20am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/1 "2006-07-12T02:20:44Z")

</div>

ENTERPRISE RUBY STUDIO

Announcing a new offering from Pragmatic Studio: An Enterprise Ruby  
Studio to be held September 11-13 in Boston, MA. Learn how to use  
the power and expressiveness of Ruby, and how to use it as your  
enterprise “glue.”

* * *

## Use Ruby for Enterprise Software Development

Enterprise software development is often about integrating  
information from multiple systems, usually built with disparate  
technologies, in order to increase the value of both the applications  
you?re building today and the longevity of your existing  
applications, resources, and data. An in-depth knowledge of Ruby, a  
cross-platform, object-oriented programming language, will allow you  
to tie such systems together, and do so with incredible flexibility.

* * *

## Learn Advanced Ruby Features

You?ll also gain hands-on experience using metaprogramming, domain  
specific languages, LDAP, XML, web services, and other advanced Ruby  
features.

* * *

## Learn From Pros

With extensive experience using Java, .NET, _and_ Ruby, Justin  
Gehtland and Stu Halloway really understand the enterprise  
landscape. They bring diverse backgrounds to this Studio to help you  
choose the best tool for the job. In addition to their ongoing  
client work, they are the authors of the upcoming book “Rails for  
Java Programmers” and the creators of the open source Streamlined  
framework.

* * *

## Register

Sign up by July 31st for a $200 early registration discount.  
Register at:

[Ruby Course | The Pragmatic Studio](http://pragmaticstudio.com/ruby)

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2006, 6:01am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/2 "2006-07-12T06:01:00Z")

</div>

On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Mike C. wrote:

> [snip]

Not to be a jerk or anything, but IMO the proper tag for this is  
[ADV] not [ANN].

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2006, 8:04am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/3 "2006-07-12T08:04:28Z")

</div>

Logan C. wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Mike C. wrote:
> 
> > [snip]
> 
> Not to be a jerk or anything, but IMO the proper tag for this is [ADV]  
> not [ANN].

Perhaps… but Dave of all people deserves to be  
cut some slack. He’s given quite a lot to this  
community.

Hal

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2006, 4:50pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/4 "2006-07-12T16:50:01Z")

</div>

On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Logan C. wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Mike C. wrote:
> 
> > [snip]
> 
> Not to be a jerk or anything, but IMO the proper tag for this is  
> [ADV] not [ANN].

Thanks for setting me straight. It was an honest oversight on my part.

Regards,

Mike

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2006, 5:41pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/5 "2006-07-12T17:41:22Z")

</div>

On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:01 AM, Hal F. wrote:

> Hal

Well that’s why i tried to say it a “I know that this might come out  
like I’m being an asshole way, but I think personally that probably  
maybe the tag should be ADV”. Note that I only say this from past  
experience where things that cost money where announced on here had  
ADV tags and ANN is almost always new projects. Really I wasn’t  
trying to be mean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2006, 2:14pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/6 "2006-07-13T14:14:15Z")

</div>

Hal F. wrote:

> Logan C. wrote:
> 
> > like I’m being an asshole way, but I think personally that probably  
> > maybe the tag should be ADV". Note that I only say this from past  
> > experience where things that cost money where announced on here had ADV  
> > tags and ANN is almost always new projects. Really I wasn’t trying to  
> > be mean.
> 
> I know you weren’t being mean. I even concur in the  
> general case.
> 
> As much as anything else, I wanted to draw attention  
> to who was ultimately behind this (in case you or  
> anyone else missed the “pragmatic” keyword).
> 
> Hal

I checked out the site, and thought it looked similar  
to the PragProgs site, but couldn’t find any link to them.  
I was all set to rant about freeloaders taking advantage  
of the PragProgs rep, but decided to double check the PragProg  
site. Lucky for me! Maybe they need their own flag, [PragProg] maybe?

cheers

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@mikec](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/mikec)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2006, 4:06am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/enterprise-ruby-studio/98026/7 "2006-07-13T04:06:22Z")

</div>

Logan C. wrote:

> like I’m being an asshole way, but I think personally that probably  
> maybe the tag should be ADV". Note that I only say this from past  
> experience where things that cost money where announced on here had ADV  
> tags and ANN is almost always new projects. Really I wasn’t trying to  
> be mean.

I know you weren’t being mean. I even concur in the  
general case.

As much as anything else, I wanted to draw attention  
to who was ultimately behind this (in case you or  
anyone else missed the “pragmatic” keyword).

Hal
