# Debian ruby-gnome2 bugs

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540>\
**Category:** Ruby-Gnome 2\
**Created:** [July 4, 2009, 1:55pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540 "2009-07-04T13:55:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/arnaudcoquelet)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2009, 1:55pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540/1 "2009-07-04T13:55:40Z")

</div>

Hello,

On my current debian system (with 0.19.0) I can easily reproduce the two  
following bugs.  
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519786](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519786)  
[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502262](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502262)

The first one is a crash you will be interested in. The second seems  
very thread related at first sight but maybe you’ll have a solution.

Can you give them a look ?

## Thanks,

Arnaud C.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/arnaudcoquelet)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2009, 6:09pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540/2 "2009-07-07T18:09:34Z")

</div>

Hi,

In [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
“[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Debian ruby-gnome2 bugs” on Sat, 4 Jul 2009  
13:35:27 +0200,  
Arnaud C. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> On my current debian system (with 0.19.0) I can easily reproduce the two  
> following bugs.  
> [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519786](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519786)  
> [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502262](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502262)
> 
> The first one is a crash you will be interested in. The second seems  
> very thread related at first sight but maybe you’ll have a solution.
> 
> Can you give them a look ?

Thanks for reporting.  
I tried the former and the problem was reproduced on  
my environment. I’ll try to fix it.

## Thanks,

kou

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/arnaudcoquelet)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2009, 8:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540/3 "2009-07-26T08:55:33Z")

</div>

Hi,

Sorry for my late work.

In [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
“Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Debian ruby-gnome2 bugs” on Tue, 07 Jul  
2009 21:32:39 +0900 (JST),  
Kouhei S. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> > very thread related at first sight but maybe you’ll have a solution.
> > 
> > Can you give them a look ?
> 
> Thanks for reporting.  
> I tried the former and the problem was reproduced on  
> my environment. I’ll try to fix it.

I’ve fixed the former in trunk.  
I’ll release the current trunk as 0.19.1.

The later bug is a work for the next release. (maybe)

## Thanks,

kou

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@arnaudcoquelet](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/arnaudcoquelet)\
**Post date:** [September 23, 2009, 1:53am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/debian-ruby-gnome2-bugs/171540/4 "2009-09-23T01:53:40Z")

</div>

Hi,

In [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
“Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Debian ruby-gnome2 bugs” on Sun, 26 Jul  
2009 15:40:26 +0900 (JST),  
Kouhei S. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> > Thanks for reporting.  
> > I tried the former and the problem was reproduced on  
> > my environment. I’ll try to fix it.
> 
> I’ve fixed the former in trunk.  
> I’ll release the current trunk as 0.19.1.
> 
> The later bug is a work for the next release. (maybe)

I’ve fixed the later in trunk.

## Thanks,

kou
