# Comparison of versions

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/comparison-of-versions/51023>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [December 24, 2005, 2:04am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/comparison-of-versions/51023 "2005-12-24T02:04:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2005, 2:04am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/comparison-of-versions/51023/1 "2005-12-24T02:04:47Z")

</div>

With regard to version numbers does one consider

1.0.0 == 1.0 ?

T.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2005, 2:31am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/comparison-of-versions/51023/2 "2005-12-24T02:31:28Z")

</div>

Trans wrote:

> With regard to version numbers does one consider
> 
> 1.0.0 == 1.0 ?

Assuming it is not rounded, yes 🙂

> T.

E

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/dfb087/32.png) [@Trans](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Trans)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2005, 2:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/comparison-of-versions/51023/3 "2005-12-24T02:55:56Z")

</div>

Trans wrote:

> With regard to version numbers does one consider
> 
> 1.0.0 == 1.0 ?

Not necessarily. 1.0 may include 1.0.0 and 1.0.n.

Cheers,  
Dave