# Code Review: MSpecBug

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/code-review-mspecbug/177305>\
**Category:** IronRuby\
**Created:** [October 14, 2009, 6:25pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/code-review-mspecbug/177305 "2009-10-14T18:25:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grujildo](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/94ad74/32.png) [@grujildo](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/grujildo)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2009, 6:25pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/code-review-mspecbug/177305/1 "2009-10-14T18:25:18Z")

</div>

tfpt review “/shelveset:MSpecBug;REDMOND\tomat”  
Comment :  
Fixes a bug in MSpec. The current implementation removes an alias for  
:respond\_to method while it still needs it. There is a bug in MRI that  
covers this up.  
See: [http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2202](http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2202)  
Fixes: [http://ironruby.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2051](http://ironruby.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2051)

Tomas

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grujildo](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/94ad74/32.png) [@grujildo](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/grujildo)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2009, 10:25pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/code-review-mspecbug/177305/2 "2009-10-14T22:25:20Z")

</div>

Looks good.