# Class System::Int64 does not have a valid constructor

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/class-system-int64-does-not-have-a-valid-constructor/189158>\
**Category:** IronRuby\
**Created:** [May 25, 2010, 6:47pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/class-system-int64-does-not-have-a-valid-constructor/189158 "2010-05-25T18:47:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Bobby_J)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2010, 6:47pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/class-system-int64-does-not-have-a-valid-constructor/189158/1 "2010-05-25T18:47:00Z")

</div>

[http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/206766](http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/206766)

Someone posted about this error back in March, but I didn’t see any  
resolution posted. Any one discovered a workaround or fix for the issue  
described in the original post?

–  
“The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be  
correct.”

- Occam’s Razor  
[Occam's razor - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Bobby_J)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 4:37pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/class-system-int64-does-not-have-a-valid-constructor/189158/2 "2010-05-26T16:37:38Z")

</div>

Ok, so either nobody else on the list is actively trying to build a  
rails  
site using IronRuby and sqlite or I have missed something so painfully  
obvious nobody has the heart to tell me what it is for fear that I may  
abandon my efforts and take up a life of [VB.NET](http://VB.NET) programming.

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Bobby J.  
[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)wrote:

> - Occam’s Razor  
> [Occam's razor - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s\_Razor](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor)

–  
“The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be  
correct.”

- Occam’s Razor  
[Occam's razor - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Bobby\_J](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Bobby_J)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2010, 4:47pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/class-system-int64-does-not-have-a-valid-constructor/189158/3 "2010-05-26T16:47:35Z")

</div>

Oh Bobby, so dramatic 🙂

Honestly, I don’t know of anyone really using the sqlite3 support, as  
the sqlserver support is preferred and also supports database files. I’m  
also not aware of how tested sqlite3 is in ironruby – is the maintainer  
on the list?

Is there a bug open for this?

~Jimmy

On May 26, 2010, at 10:38 AM, “Bobby J.”  
\<removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)\> wrote:

Ok, so either nobody else on the list is actively trying to build a  
rails site using IronRuby and sqlite or I have missed something so  
painfully obvious nobody has the heart to tell me what it is for fear  
that I may abandon my efforts and take up a life of [http://VB.NET](http://VB.NET)  
[VB.NET](http://VB.NET)[http://VB.NET](http://VB.NET) programming.

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Bobby J.  
\<[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)\>  
wrote:  
[http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/206766](http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/206766)[Question about test ironruby for rails - IronRuby - Ruby-Forum](http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/206766)

Someone posted about this error back in March, but I didn’t see any  
resolution posted. Any one discovered a workaround or fix for the issue  
described in the original post?

–  
“The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be  
correct.”

- Occam’s Razor  
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s\_Razor](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor)[Occam's razor - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)

–  
“The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be  
correct.”

- Occam’s Razor  
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s\_Razor](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)[Occam's razor - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor)

* * *

Ironruby-core mailing list  
removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid[mailto:removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)  
[http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core](http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core)