Can deploying Rails in production be easier than this?

Rails
21

George,

Thanks for the info. I’m testing it right now. One suggestion: get a
designer for the admin interface. It looks so 1994! :wink:

Thanks again,

Adrian M.

On 8/25/06, George W. [email protected] wrote:

Best Regards,
new development work in the free version? What will I be really missing from

Rails configuration. With 2.2 release, you only need to tell LSWS the
reliability.
–
Adrian Esteban Madrid

–
Adrian Esteban Madrid

22

George W. wrote:

Hi Daya,

Please consider win32 release seriously..

Due to the dramatic differences between Windows and Unix(s), porting the
whole LSWS product is a not a easy task, however, a dedicated Rails
application server is possible, if the demand is high enough. :slight_smile:

Would a VMWare image be a good way of giving Windows users something to
work with? It could contain a configured and running LiteSpeed/Rails/DB
setup on Linux or BSD.

regards

Justin

23

I am currently using mongrel + apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer.

The LSAPI stuff got me a little confused, is it that if i use LSAPI of
Litespeed and remove mongrel, it will be faster? Or it is meant to be in
conjunction with mongrel?

I was just wondering, what is the best configuration with Litespeed?

On 8/26/06, Justin F. [email protected] wrote:

Would a VMWare image be a good way of giving Windows users something to
work with? It could contain a configured and running LiteSpeed/Rails/DB
setup on Linux or BSD.

regards

Justin

–
nothing much to talk

24

On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 02:23 +0530, hemant wrote:

I am currently using mongrel + apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_balancer.

The LSAPI stuff got me a little confused, is it that if i use LSAPI of
Litespeed and remove mongrel, it will be faster? Or it is meant to be
in conjunction with mongrel?

I was just wondering, what is the best configuration with Litespeed?

Litspeed is independent of Mongrel if you use their LSAPI setup. If you
use their proxy config then you need to use Mongrel.

–
Zed A. Shaw

http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/
http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 – Come get help.

25

Due to the dramatic differences between Windows and Unix(s), porting the
whole LSWS product is a not a easy task, however, a dedicated Rails
application server is possible, if the demand is high enough. :slight_smile:

Would a VMWare image be a good way of giving Windows users something to
work with? It could contain a configured and running LiteSpeed/Rails/DB
setup on Linux or BSD.

Justin,

Thanks! That’s a pretty good idea, and pretty easy to do. It is good
solution for someone familiar with Linux to try it on a windows machine.

George

26

LiteSpeed can be used together with Mongrel or Ruby LSAPI, LSAPI will
give a little bit better performance according third party benchmarks,
but the difference is not that big.
http://wota.jp/ac/?date=20060608

Rails easy configuration is available with LSAPI.

Best Regards,
George