On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:17:15AM +0900, Patrick H. wrote:
against a Win32 API that required the use of threads. Now I am curious
about TRAP_BEG/TRAP_END. Is it safe to access rb_XXX methods from
inside a TRAP_BEG/TRAP_END block not in the ruby interpreter thread?
If so that would make some things much easier.
What goes between TRAP_BEG/TRAP_END should be something that returns in
the event of a signal (such as SIGVTALRM, which ruby uses to know when
to switch threads). Usually system calls will return an error code and
set errno to EINTR. The system call must later be restarted when
control returns to the thread.
I don’t believe most rb_XXX methods have this behavior, so you won’t get
the magic thread switching you get with system calls.
Paul