# \[Assigned\] gcc 4.1.2 for x86 can't build trunk

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/assigned-gcc-4-1-2-for-x86-cant-build-trunk/232626>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [October 19, 2014, 9:12am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/assigned-gcc-4-1-2-for-x86-cant-build-trunk/232626 "2014-10-19T09:12:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![addis\_a](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/c4cdca/32.png) [@addis\_a](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/addis_a)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2014, 9:12am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/assigned-gcc-4-1-2-for-x86-cant-build-trunk/232626/1 "2014-10-19T09:12:41Z")

</div>

Issue #10397 has been reported by Yui NARUSE.

* * *

Bug #10397: gcc 4.1.2 for x86 can’t build trunk

> **[Bug #10397: gcc 4.1.2 for x86 can't build trunk - Ruby master - Ruby Issue...](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10397)**
>
> Redmine

- Author: Yui NARUSE
- Status: Assigned
- Priority: Normal
- Assignee: Vit O.
- Category: build
- Target version: current: 2.2.0
- ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-09-13) [i686-linux]
- Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/4bbf92/32.png) [@unknown](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/unknown)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2014, 9:55am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/assigned-gcc-4-1-2-for-x86-cant-build-trunk/232626/2 "2014-10-19T09:55:30Z")

</div>

[removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:

> - Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN  
> Wrong list? Cc-ing ruby-core

> Recently CentOS 5.6 x86 can’t build ruby-trunk.  
> This is since r47562 and it hit [gcc  
> bug](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16185).

Oops. I didn’t think r47562 was too strange for a compiler :x

> Do people want CRuby to continue RHEL/CentOS 5.6 support?  
> If so, ideally it is fixed by gcc.

Problem seems isolated to 32-bit x86, x86-64 on CentOS 5.4  
has no problem (but I’m not using CentOS 5.x much anymore)

$ gcc --version  
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)

I can probably continue with x86-64, but not 32-bit.