# Arcadia IDE (was: Re: Confirm My Ruby/GUI investigation?)

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/arcadia-ide-was-re-confirm-my-ruby-gui-investigation/122618>\
**Category:** Ruby\
**Created:** [December 10, 2007, 6:10am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/arcadia-ide-was-re-confirm-my-ruby-gui-investigation/122618 "2007-12-10T06:10:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wrishel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/df705f/32.png) [@wrishel](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/wrishel)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2007, 6:10am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/arcadia-ide-was-re-confirm-my-ruby-gui-investigation/122618/1 "2007-12-10T06:10:03Z")

</div>

> Re: Confirm My Ruby/GUI investigation?  
> Posted by botp (Guest) on 10.12.2007 05:36  
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:04 PM, Marc H. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) wrote:
> 
> > Maybe for these requirements, Tk really wins. Its almost as if  
> > these requirements are head-tailored in favour of Tk! 🙂

> well, maybe we can start using/supporting arcadia  
> [http://arcadia.rubyforge.org/](http://arcadia.rubyforge.org/)

> kind regards -botp 🙂

Arcadia looks very nice on its Web site. I wonder if anyone on this  
thread has used it?
