# \[ANN\] Rails 1.1.1: Fixing a slew of minors (but you must sti **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [April 6, 2006, 10:54pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-rails-1-1-1-fixing-a-slew-of-minors-but-you-must-sti/57069 "2006-04-06T22:54:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/bbe5ce/32.png) [@divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/divotdave)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2006, 10:54pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-rails-1-1-1-fixing-a-slew-of-minors-but-you-must-sti/57069/1 "2006-04-06T22:54:08Z")
Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we’ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn’t work with Typo, though. And it won’t. Instead you must freeze Rails 1.0 to vendor/rails if you run Typo 2.6.0 while we await the new release from the Typo team that will be fully 1.1 compatible. This is the release we recommend that hosting companies upgrade to. If you still haven’t frozen your application and it for some reason doesn’t work with Rails 1.1.1, don’t run crying to them. We screwed up in the release notes of the last release by not telling people that Typo would break, but now that this information is spread far and wide, it’ll rest on your shoulders to make sure you’re frozen and stay cool. ## If you still haven’t upgraded to Rails 1.1, checkout the original announcement for a run-through of all the features. David Heinemeier H. [http://www.loudthinking.com](http://www.loudthinking.com) – Broadcasting Brain [http://www.basecamphq.com](http://www.basecamphq.com) – Online project management [http://www.backpackit.com](http://www.backpackit.com) – Personal information manager [http://www.rubyonrails.com](http://www.rubyonrails.com) – Web-application framework ---
**Author:** ![divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/bbe5ce/32.png) [@divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/divotdave)\ **Post date:** [April 7, 2006, 11:33am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-rails-1-1-1-fixing-a-slew-of-minors-but-you-must-sti/57069/2 "2006-04-07T11:33:01Z")
Hi, I have installed Rails 1.1 onto my system. BTW, I’m new to RoR. So, what version should I install and build new application with? What version are you recommending to hosting companies? 1.1 or 1.1.1? Thanks in advance, -Conrad ---
**Author:** ![divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/bbe5ce/32.png) [@divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/divotdave)\ **Post date:** [April 7, 2006, 11:48am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-rails-1-1-1-fixing-a-slew-of-minors-but-you-must-sti/57069/3 "2006-04-07T11:48:20Z")
1.1.1 still can not used cache\_model ☹ 2006/4/7, Conrad T. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid): > > Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we’ve been > > This is the release we recommend that hosting companies upgrade to. If > > David Heinemeier H. > > Rails mailing list > > removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid > > [http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails](http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails) – Best Regards, Caiwangqin [http://www.uuzone.com](http://www.uuzone.com) Mobile: +8613951787088 Tel: +86025-84818086 ext 233 Fax: +86025-84814993 ---
**Author:** ![divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/bbe5ce/32.png) [@divotdave](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/divotdave)\ **Post date:** [April 7, 2006, 11:51am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-rails-1-1-1-fixing-a-slew-of-minors-but-you-must-sti/57069/4 "2006-04-07T11:51:21Z")
On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Conrad T. wrote: > Hi, I have installed Rails 1.1 onto my system. BTW, I’m new to RoR. > So, what version should I install and build new application with? The current released version 1.1.1. > What version are you recommending to hosting companies? 1.1 or 1.1.1? > On 4/6/06, David Heinemeier H. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) > wrote: snip… > > This is the release we recommend that hosting companies upgrade to. – – Tom M.