# \[ANN\] New site to compare Rails hosting companies

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [January 8, 2007, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376 "2007-01-08T17:00:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 5:00pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/1 "2007-01-08T17:00:50Z")

</div>

Hi,

I need the help of the Rails community. I have just launched a new  
website to compare and review Ruby on Rails hosting companies,  
[http://www.railshostinginfo.com](http://www.railshostinginfo.com). This site is created out of pure  
frustation. I have literally spend days searching and comparing possible  
hosting companies to host my Rails projects. It is really hard to find  
good information about the various hosting companies. And even more so  
on their capabilities of hosting Rails.

It is impossible for me to test them all. So I need your help! Do you  
know a good Rails hosting company, please suggest it at the site. I have  
already added some fine Ruby on Rails hosting companies, so you get an  
idea of the end product. If you have an opinion about the companies that  
are already added, please post your review. And help to make it a little  
easier for others to choose a good Rails hosting company.

All help and comments are welcome. Thanks.

Kind regards,

Nick

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 5:29pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/2 "2007-01-08T17:29:18Z")

</div>

Nick S. wrote:

> Nick

Good idea, signed up and suggested one already.  
Would be nice to sort on attributes, i.e. disk space/bandwidth/cost  
etc., rather than just price.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 5:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/3 "2007-01-08T17:46:21Z")

</div>

Hi Nick,

I get an application error when I try to use your contact form

Daniel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 9:07pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/4 "2007-01-08T21:07:54Z")

</div>

At Scott: Thanks Scott for the suggestion, I will add it within a few  
minutes. By the way it is possible to sort on attributes, like disk  
space, bandwidth, etc. The sort bar is located just above the blue table  
header. Maybe I should integrate it in the table. What do you think?

At Daniel: thanks for reporting the error. It has been fixed now. Your  
message got saved, so I have submitted my site to [hallwaytesting.com](http://hallwaytesting.com) and  
hopefully I get some good usability pointers. Be though!

To all who suggested hosting companies and placed a review. Thank you.  
And keep them coming!

Kind regards,

Nick

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 9:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/5 "2007-01-08T21:46:48Z")

</div>

I see you’re using Solr for text search. Did you look into using Ferret  
at all?

[http://ferret.davebalmain.com/trac](http://ferret.davebalmain.com/trac)

Not to knock Solr ([Welcome to Apache Solr - Apache Solr](http://incubator.apache.org/solr/)), which I assume  
is fine, just curious since it would have saved you from running a Java  
servlet container on the box.

- Brian

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/aca169/32.png) [@nicksnels](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/nicksnels)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 10:44pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/ann-new-site-to-compare-rails-hosting-companies/81376/6 "2007-01-08T22:44:01Z")

</div>

Hi Brian,

I most certainly looked at Ferret. I used it from day one, back in 2005.  
Ferret was the reason I made the definite switch to Rails. I was looking  
for a good search engine that was comparable to Lucene, but I didn’t  
want to learn Java (Spring, Hibernate, …). I tested it for half a year  
and it worked quite nicely. But back than it was written completely in  
Ruby, so it was way slower than Lucene. And David was in the process of  
porting it completely to a C version, which resulted in no C Windows  
version and an alpha and later a beta status. So at that time I didn’t  
consider it stable enough to use it in production.

Erik H. author of the Lucene in Action book posted a message to the  
Ferret list telling about Solr. I even posted a reply telling that using  
Solr was too completed because of the dependency of Java and  
Tomcat/Jetty. But after I had tested it, I saw its power. It is really  
easy to use, extremely fast and it has some nice features like caching  
and faceted searching and even a ruby output (instead of the default xml  
output). Now all my projects are based around Solr and Rails.

Ferret is much more stable these days and a lot faster. David has done a  
really good job. So if you aren’t into Java, are you like to keep it  
simple, Ferret is the way to go.

Kind regards,

Nick
