Alias Page Extension

Ruby Apps Radiant CMS
21

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Steven S.
[email protected] wrote:

Oh, mini_magick might be better. I’m hosting on Joyent and they don’t have
rmagick. They don’t have mini_magick either but I might be able to freeze
that one in. What changes do I need to make to have it work with
mini_magick?

After running the radiant:extensions:gallery:install task, you can
edit the gallery.yml file
(/vendor/extensions/gallery/config/gallery.yml), and set mini_magick
as processor.

–
Andrea F.
http://gravityblast.com - http://nimboo.net

22

Shared accelerator. Seems like the BSD servers were loaded with
almost every gem out there. Not sure why but the new servers are more
bring your own.

23

This worked like a charm. Thank you.

24

Is Spring a BSD Server or a shared accelerator? Don’t take my word
about mini_magick, it worked when I was still on a BSD server.

25

Keith, just curious: How does Paperclip differ from attachment_fu? It
seems to have almost the exact same interface - is the only difference
that paperclip does not require rmagick, mini-magick or imagescience?

Casper F.
http://casperfabricius.com

26

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Steven S.
[email protected] wrote:

Is there a way to call an image in a gallery by name? Seems like something
like this would work but it doesn’t:

<img src=“<r:gallery:item:thumb name=“file.jpg” />” />

You can’t do it currently. But you can use the position instead
(position=“first” or position=“2”).
I’ll add that feature, it could be usefull.

–
Andrea F.
http://gravityblast.com - http://nimboo.net

27

It is actually pretty different than attachment_fu. It doesn’t require
it’s own model, just a few columns. It is a lot lighter weight. I
actually like attachment_fu a lot, but it is a bit slow and it
requires either RMagick, Mini_magick or Image Science, all of which
are problematic. So I thought I would give it a try. So far, it seems
nice, but I haven’t really tried it in production yet.

Keith B.
http://keithbingman.com

28

When I got the newest gallery extension update I couldn’t get
mini_magick to work with it. The pictures moved and stayed were I put
them but I wasn’t able to upload and new images. Also the thumbs
weren’t the right size either.

I could but the old gallery extension back in and I could upload
images fine but again the images wouldn’t stay put.

I changed the processor in gallery.yml.default to mini_magick ( I
didn’t have a gallery.yml like in the old gallery extension)

Any sugestions?

29

A guys got to keep on his toes. Okay, I had that file and changing it
made it work perfectly. Thank you for your fast reply.

-Steven

30

On 04/giu/08, at 01:02, Steven S. wrote:

When I got the newest gallery extension update I couldn’t get
mini_magick to work with it. The pictures moved and stayed were I
put them but I wasn’t able to upload and new images. Also the
thumbs weren’t the right size either.

I could but the old gallery extension back in and I could upload
images fine but again the images wouldn’t stay put.

I changed the processor in gallery.yml.default to mini_magick ( I
didn’t have a gallery.yml like in the old gallery extension)

In the new version i put the galery.yml file in RAILS_ROOT/config/
extensions/gallery/gallery.yml.
Have you got it ?

-andrea