# Acts\_as\_readonlyable in production?

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/acts-as-readonlyable-in-production/130610>\
**Category:** Rails\
**Created:** [February 29, 2008, 7:57pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/acts-as-readonlyable-in-production/130610 "2008-02-29T19:57:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marcbey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@marcbey](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/marcbey)\
**Post date:** [February 29, 2008, 7:57pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/acts-as-readonlyable-in-production/130610/1 "2008-02-29T19:57:48Z")

</div>

Is anyone else using acts\_as\_readonlyable in production?

We have been using it in production for a few months now, but only  
recently  
got a problem where 1 out of 100 inserts on one (out of 30+) tables is  
going  
to the readonly db. Anyone seen something similar?

Thanks,

Marc
