# ActiveResource will not ship with Rails 1.2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Rails\ **Created:** [November 20, 2006, 8:21pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727 "2006-11-20T20:21:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 8:21pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/1 "2006-11-20T20:21:24Z")
[http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554](http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554) ---
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 8:46pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/2 "2006-11-20T20:46:29Z")
Indeed, that grabbed my attention as well. It’s great that 1.2 will support the “publishing” REST interfaces right out of the box. At the same time, not having the functionality to consume them does make it feel a bit half-done and may defer the Coming of a New Web Service Age. Here’s to hoping a plugin for 1.2 will be stubbed out of Edge Rails! ---
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 8:59pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/3 "2006-11-20T20:59:47Z")
Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Indeed, that grabbed my attention as well. Well on the positive side RJS wasn’t done either when Rails 1.0 was released but they shipped it soon after and it was fully baked by then. I’m sure we’ll see the rest of REST (no pun intended) ship soon after. I think they just want to get 1.2 out the door. Probably on the Dec. anniversary of launching 1.0. From the notes in SVN it looks like the release candidate is coming. I do wonder how many books going to press are going to get screwed up though refering to the 1.2 REST support in Rails? ---
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 9:37pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/4 "2006-11-20T21:37:00Z")
Marcel Molina Jr. wrote: > It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight. Could you tell us more about the release scheduling of ActiveResource (or the Rails version it’ll be included in, for that matter)? - Roderick ---
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 10:04pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/5 "2006-11-20T22:04:17Z")
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:37:00PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Marcel Molina Jr. wrote: > > > It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight. > > Could you tell us more about the release scheduling of ActiveResource > (or the Rails version it’ll be included in, for that matter)? All “included in Rails” would mean is that it is marked as a dependency in the gem specification so that when you do “sudo gem install rails” it would slurp down ActiveResource. If we never bundled ActiveResource with rails, all you’d ever have to do if you were planning on using it in a rails app is “sudo gem install activeresource”. As for when ActiveResource will be released as a gem, regardless of whether rails will mark it as a dependency, there is currently no set timeline. We are currently using it already in production at 37signals and so are at least a couple other people in core (or at least, it appears they will be soon). ## marcel Marcel Molina Jr. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid) ---
**Author:** ![Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/82dd89/32.png) [@Channer\_T](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/Channer_T)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2006, 9:10pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/activeresource-will-not-ship-with-rails-1-2/76727/6 "2006-11-20T21:10:03Z")
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Channer T. wrote: > [http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554](http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5554) It was never inteded to. Having it bundled in was an oversight. ## marcel Marcel Molina Jr. [removed\_email\_address@domain.invalid](mailto:removed_email_address@domain.invalid)