# Active\_rbac

**URL:** <https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/active-rbac/107460>\
**Category:** Engines\
**Created:** [June 21, 2007, 11:39pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/active-rbac/107460 "2007-06-21T23:39:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![javier\_barcena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/dfb087/32.png) [@javier\_barcena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/javier_barcena)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2007, 11:39pm UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/active-rbac/107460/1 "2007-06-21T23:39:52Z")

</div>

Hi. Dr. james.!  
law post where you commented that it activates rbac was supported by  
engines. 1.2 now after three months of that post seguis maintaining to  
deuce? I ask to you because profit not to make it work, obvious with m  
ipoco  
knowledge. greetings Javier

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![javier\_barcena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/dfb087/32.png) [@javier\_barcena](https://www.ruby-forum.com/u/javier_barcena)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2007, 10:43am UTC](https://www.ruby-forum.com/t/active-rbac/107460/2 "2007-06-22T10:43:50Z")

</div>

Hi Javier,

I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking, but if you have queries  
about ActiveRBAC, probably the best place to go is their own mailing  
list: [http://groups.google.com/group/active-rbac](http://groups.google.com/group/active-rbac)

I believe they are moving away from relying on the engines plugin.

James