More c friendly interface to FXImage

Hi all,

I’m looking for an efficient way of image manipulation/rerendering
using fximage from fxruby:

To initialize a FXImage with a persistent pixel buffer one has to:

image = FXImage.new(getApp(), buf, IMAGE_OWNED|IMAGE_KEEP, width,
height)

where buf is an array of FXColor of size=width*height

after initialization

image.data.data

is a pointer to this buffer.

As image processing is quite computational expensive I would
appriciate a more c language friendly interface …

so for example

buf= MyPic.new

where MyPic is implemented in c using e.g.

typedef struct {
int w,h;

//let it be the 4 bytes/ rgba pixel as required by fxruby
unsiged char * pixels;

} MyPic;

This would solve the problem that after changing the MyPic buffer
pixels the rerendering of the picture requires converting it to an
array of FXColor first …

[*
Other solution would be to access the values of a ruby array in c as
an
memory block without copying it (didn’t look into the implementation
of the ruby array if it’s implemented this way at all …)
*]

Any suggestions? Is it already implemented somehow and I just don’t
see
it?

Any help would be appreciated

Artur

On 2/23/07 4:20 AM, in article
[email protected], “Artur M.”
[email protected] wrote:

I’m looking for an efficient way of image manipulation/rerendering
using fximage from fxruby:

This discussion really, really belongs on the FXRuby mailing list. But
anyways…

int w,h;

//let it be the 4 bytes/ rgba pixel as required by fxruby
unsiged char * pixels;

} MyPic;

So instead of (or as alternative to) manipulating an array of FXColor,
you’d
manipulate a Ruby string of bytes which has size 4wh? OK, I get it.

This would solve the problem that after changing the MyPic buffer
pixels the rerendering of the picture requires converting it to an
array of FXColor first …

True, but that pixels “array” (really, a String) would still need to be
converted to an array of FXColor in the C++ wrapper layer, because the
FOX
library expects an array of FXColor values.

Any suggestions? Is it already implemented somehow and I just don’t
see it?

No, you’ve got it right concerning the current approach. I would suggest
that you file a feature request about this, and we’ll see if it can be
added
in a future release of FXRuby:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=1226&group_id=300&func=browse

Thanks,

Lyle