InlineFortran version 1.0.0 has been released! http://www.rubyforge.org/projects/rubyinline == FEATURES/PROBLEMS: * Very rudimentary right now. Needs some love. == SYNOPSYS: inline :Fortran do |builder| builder.subroutine('print_integer', ["void", "int"], <<-END) subroutine print_integer( integer ) integer, intent(in) :: integer print *, 'integer: ', integer end END end == REQUIREMENTS: Changes: == 1.0.0 / 2006-10-21 * 1 major enhancement * Birthday! http://www.rubyforge.org/projects/rubyinline
on 22.10.2006 18:34
on 23.10.2006 01:25
And so we come full circle, 50 years of technological advancement have allowed us to run FORTRAN! Again. I still can't decide whether to cheer or groan ;) However, impressive, as all of RubyInline. Which reminds me, I should toy with it again to see if I can make it play along with directory names with spaces like I meant to two years ago. (Or did this happen to be fixed since?) David Vallner
on 23.10.2006 01:47
David Vallner wrote: > And so we come full circle, 50 years of technological advancement have > allowed us to run FORTRAN! Again. I still can't decide whether to cheer > or groan ;) > I haven't written any Fortran since 1990. I suppose it *would* come back to me. 50 years, eh? Well ... I wrote my first Fortran (II) programs almost that long ago. At least the machines *were* solid-state. :) So you *can* write Fortran programs in any language!
on 23.10.2006 01:55
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Well ... I wrote my first Fortran (II) programs > almost that long ago. At least the machines *were* solid-state. :) > /me hides Edward's Zimmer frame, steals apples from his garden, and stands on his lawn. > So you *can* write Fortran programs in any language! > Now it's decided. *groan* David Vallner