Ruby Forum Ruby > rcov 0.7.0 (code coverage for Ruby)

Source code, additional information, screenshots... available at
    http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov
Release information:
    http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov+0.7.0

Sample (fully) cross-referenced report at
    http://eigenclass.org/static/rcov-sample-report-full-crossref/

This release includes two RubyGems packages: a binary one for Win32 and 
a
platform-independent one for all those with a compiler, (or a lot of 
patience,
if willing to run rcov in pure-Ruby mode), so
  gem install rcov
should work once the packages have propagated to the mirror network (as 
of
14:20 UTC, about 5H since I uploaded them to Rubyforge, they haven't).

Overview
========
rcov is a code coverage tool for Ruby. It is commonly used for viewing 
overall
test coverage of target code. It features:
* fast execution: 20-300 times faster than previous tools
* multiple analysis modes: standard, bogo-profile, "intentional 
testing",
  dependency analysis...
* detection of uncovered code introduced since the last run 
("differential
  code coverage")
* fairly accurate coverage information through code linkage inference 
using
  simple heuristics
* cross-referenced XHTML and several kinds of text reports
* support for easy automation with Rake and Rant
* colorblind-friendliness

What's new in 0.7.0
===================
See http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov+0.7.0 for the detailed change 
summary.

Features
--------
* coverage/callsite data from multiple runs can be aggregated 
(--aggregate)

Bugfixes
--------
* the SCRIPT_LINES__ workaround works better
* fixed silly bug in coverage data acquisition (line after the correct 
one
  marked in some situations)
* avoid problems with repeated path separators in default ignore list, 
based
  on rbconfig's data


How do I use it?
================

In the common scenario, your tests are under test/ and the target code
(whose coverage you want) is in lib/. In that case, all you have to do 
is
use rcov to run the tests (instead of testrb), and a number of XHTML 
files
with the code coverage information will be generated, e.g.

    rcov -Ilib test/*.rb

will execute all the .rb files under test/ and generate the code 
coverage
report for the target code (i.e. for the files in lib/) under coverage/. 
The
target code needs not be under lib/; rcov will detect is as long as it 
is
require()d by the tests. rcov is smart enough to ignore "uninteresting"
files: the tests themselves, files installed in Ruby's standard 
locations,
etc.  See  rcov --help  for the list of regexps rcov matches filenames
against.

rcov can also be used from Rake; see README.rake or the RDoc 
documentation
for more information.

rcov can output information in several formats, and perform different 
kinds
of analyses in addition to plain code coverage.  See  rcov --help  for a
description of the available options.

Sample output
=============

See http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov (once again) for screenshots.

The text report (also used by default in RcovTasks) resembles


+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  File                               | Lines |  LOC  |  COV   |
+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+--------+
|lib/rcov.rb                                          |   572 |   358 |  91.3% |
+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+--------+
|Total                                                |   572 |   358 |  91.3% |
+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+--------+
91.3%   1 file(s)   572 Lines   358 LOC



The (undecorated) textual output with execution count information looks 
like this:

 $ rcov --no-html --text-counts b.rb
 ================================================================================
 ./b.rb
 ================================================================================
                                                                       | 
2
 a, b, c = (1..3).to_a                                                 | 
2
 10.times do                                                           | 
1
   a += 1                                                              | 
10
   20.times do |i|                                                     | 
10
     b += i                                                            | 
200
     b.times do                                                        | 
200
       c += (j = (b-a).abs) > 0 ? j : 0                                | 
738800
     end                                                               | 
0
   end                                                                 | 
0
 end                                                                   | 
0


rcov can detect when you've added code that was not covered by your unit
tests:

    $ rcov --text-coverage-diff --no-color test/*.rb
    Started
    .......................................
    Finished in 1.163085 seconds.

    39 tests, 415 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors

    ================================================================================
    !!!!! Uncovered code introduced in lib/rcov.rb

    ### lib/rcov.rb:207

	 def precompute_coverage(comments_run_by_default = true)
	   changed = false
	   lastidx = lines.size - 1
	   if (!is_code?(lastidx) || /^__END__$/ =~ @lines[-1]) && 
!@coverage[lastidx]
    !!       # mark the last block of comments
    !!       @coverage[lastidx] ||= :inferred
    !!       (lastidx-1).downto(0) do |i|
    !!         break if is_code?(i)
    !!         @coverage[i] ||= :inferred
    !!       end
    !!     end
	   (0...lines.size).each do |i|
	     next if @coverage[i]
	     line = @lines[i]

Thanks
======
Thomas Leitner:
* reported that the SCRIPT_LINES__ workaround did not always work

Assaph Mehr:
* beta-tested 0.7.0 and found a bug in --aggregate (missing files)

Ryan Kinderman:
* suggested that -Ipath be passed to ruby instead of rcov in RcovTasks

License
-------
rcov is released under the terms of Ruby's license.
rcov includes xx 0.1.0, which is subject to the following conditions:

ePark Labs Public License version 1
Copyright (c) 2005, ePark Labs, Inc. and contributors
All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 
modification,
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 
notice, this
     list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
  2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 
notice,
     this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the 
documentation
     and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
  3. Neither the name of ePark Labs nor the names of its contributors 
may be
     used to endorse or promote products derived from this software 
without
     specific prior written permission.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS 
IS" AND
ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE 
IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE 
LIABLE FOR
ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL 
DAMAGES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR 
SERVICES;
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED 
AND ON
ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF 
THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

I am wondering, for a rails project, would this be the correct way to 
use
this?

rcov -Ilib test/**/*.rb

That works for me, albeit about 30% of my tests fail then, while when I 
run
them using the rake task ("rake"), they all pass. So I suppose I must be
doing something wrong.


Thanks alot, great project,


Rob

On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:15 PM, Robert MannI wrote:

> doing something wrong.
>
>
> Thanks alot, great project,
>
http://www.agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins/rails_rcov

That plugin takes a lot of the headache out of using rails + rcov.
(Please don't top post).

Mauricio thanks for the excellent tool.  I use it every day.

Michael

On 8/7/06, Robert MannI <robmnl@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am wondering, for a rails project, would this be the correct way to use
> this?
>
> rcov -Ilib test/**/*.rb
>
> That works for me, albeit about 30% of my tests fail then, while when I run
> them using the rake task ("rake"), they all pass. So I suppose I must be
> doing something wrong.

This was actually discovered on a rails project. In Rails case there
seems to be some weird interaction where running all tests
(integreation and functional for me) causes clashes. The rake tasks
for rails also launch a separate test process for each, and now rcov
mimics that.

Using the coverage.task template provided by Mauricio for rails seems
to fix the issue.

HTH,
Assaph

Hi,

 sorry for being -- may be -- a little offtopic.

 Currently I am playing around with """""encryption""""" -- the
 meaning of all those "'s is: "Encryption" in the sense of "convert
 readable text into unreadable text" not in the sense of "Bullet
 proof encryption suitable for secret service agents".

 Just something to play around with...

 What I need is the following "device":

 Input is a freely defineable range of anything a byte can stand
 for. Output is again a value of the same range. This mapping from an
 input to an output value should be made variable in two manners:
 First is to change the mapping itsself the second way is to define
 an offset. This should work as follows:

 Without offset:         With offset 3:

 A -> Z                    A -> I    // wrapped around from the end
 B -> H                    B -> B    // of the previously defined
 C -> L                    C -> Q    // range
 D -> P                    D -> Z
 E -> F                    E -> H
 F -> D                    F -> L
 .                         G -> P
 .                         H -> F
 .                         I -> D

 The offset should be changeable at each new mapping action.

 My first idea was to define an Hash which maps an input range
 to an index. To this index it is easy to add an offset. The
 second step would be an array, which maps the new calculated index
 (old index + offset) to the same range again, but this time
 the range was "sorted" by sort{rand} st initialization time.

 But when I do a "a=device.new", what should I return as an obejct
 to the caller ??? TWO objects -- the hash AND the array ?

 I am curious whether there are better, more elegant ways to accomplish
 this in a more rubyish way.

 I would be happy to read of your ideas how to implement this! :)
 Thank you very much in advance for any help and any idea !

 Ruby! :)
 mcc

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:15:30PM +0900, Robert MannI wrote:
> I am wondering, for a rails project, would this be the correct way to use
> this?
> 
> rcov -Ilib test/**/*.rb
> 
> That works for me, albeit about 30% of my tests fail then, while when I run
> them using the rake task ("rake"), they all pass. So I suppose I must be
> doing something wrong.

As Assaph said, this can fail in some circumstances, the reason being 
that
unit, functional and integration tests cannot always be run in the same
process safely; this is why the test task in Rails apps executes them
separately.

So, if you are lucky and there are no clashes, just

  rcov --rails -Ilib test/**/*_test.rb

would do. --rails tells rcov to ignore config/, environment/ and vendor/ 
in
the statistics.

Now, if you see that the outcome of the tests when run as shown above 
differs
from the results given by  rake test (as happened to you), you have to 
execute
unit, functional and integration tests in three different processes.
You can do it manually as follows:

  rm -f coverage.data
  rcov --no-html  --rails --aggregate coverage.data -Ilib 
test/unit/*_test.rb
  rcov --no-html --rails --aggregate coverage.data -Ilib 
test/functional/*_test.rb
  rcov --rails --aggregate coverage.data -Ilib 
test/integration/*_test.rb

--aggregate is used to merge the coverage data from the three runs in a
single report; --no-html is used in the first two runs because anyway 
the
last execution will create the report with all the information.

If you want a recipe to automate that, have a look at
 http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?rcov+0.7.0
where I show a small snippet you can dump into e.g. lib/tasks/rcov.rake.
It will generate a number of tasks in the test:coverage namespace, as 
well as
a test:coverage task that runs all the tests under rcov.

Unfortunately, --aggregate is relatively slow because it has to save 
quite a
lot of information across runs: all the Ruby code that was parsed, the
coverage data, etc. There's no way around that though. Of course, you 
can also
create separate reports for unit, functional and integration tests 
(using -o
to choose the destination dirs for the reports, and omitting 
--aggregate),
but you won't be able to obtain a single unified coverage rate that way.

HTH,

On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:

>  My first idea was to define an Hash which maps an input range
>  to an index. To this index it is easy to add an offset. The
>  second step would be an array, which maps the new calculated index
>  (old index + offset) to the same range again, but this time
>  the range was "sorted" by sort{rand} st initialization time.
>
>  But when I do a "a=device.new", what should I return as an obejct
>  to the caller ??? TWO objects -- the hash AND the array ?

The whole point of wrapping something like this is in an object is
that these are just internal details user code for the object never
needs to worry about.  For example, users are going to call your code
something like:

   dev   = Device.new( .. )
   after = dev.encryrpt(before)

All they know is that they are working with a Device.  They don't
need to worry about Hashes and Arrays.

I recommend using a Hash internally in the object.  When a problem
says "mapping" that usually means Hash.  You could build the
interface to handle either a Hash or an Integer being passed to the
constructor:

   class Device
     def initialize(mapping_or_offset)
       if mapping_or_offset.is_a? Hash
         @mapping = build_mapping_from_hash(mapping_or_offset)
       else # offset
         @mapping = build_mapping_from_integer(mapping_or_offset)
       end
     end

     def encrypt(bytes)
       # use @mapping here...
     end

     private

     def build_mapping_from_hash(hash)
       # ...
     end

     def build_mapping_from_integer(integer)
       # ...
     end
   end

Hope that gives you some fresh ideas.

James Edward Gray II

Mauricio, the coverage tasks is awesome.

It is working for me now.

Speed is not an issue for me, as I only do coverage runs once in a 
while.




Thank you,
Rob