Forum: Ruby on Rails Why doesn't Rails 1.1 have all the Script.aculo.us 1.6

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Dave Myron (Guest)
on 2006-06-09 01:24
(Received via mailing list)
Ran across this today. Builder.js was removed *but* effects.js
references Builder (~line 115, inside tagifyText I think) and will throw
errors, obviously, if builder.js hasn't been loaded. I can see the
intent of removing scriptaculous.js, builder.js and slider.js, but they
should be removed if one of the remaining files depends on features
provided by [one of] them.

As it stands, scriptaculous support is broken 'out of the box' in a new
Rails app because of the removal of builder.js.

dave myron
principal, technical director

contentfree
â?¡ 206.855.5580 phone | 206.774.2767 fax
â?  removed_email_address@domain.invalid
â?? 337 1st ave ne. suite 100, issaquah, wa 98027
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.