Folks, I have a real opportunity to make a difference here. But I need some help, and the lack of documentation on this subject is a major hindrance. To do an install, I have to do a build (unlike my PC). For that, I need a bit more assistance. Dan B. was very helpful when he laid out this process: > >> make distclean >> ./configure --prefix=/wherever/you/want >> make >> make install >> That's a good process that will probably work decently. But then Ara Howard added this cryptic note: > > don't forget to do both of these before compiling > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/wherever/you/want/lib > LD_RUN_PATH=/wherever/you/want/lib # most important! > > if you do this all the stuff you compile it will > inter-operate nicely--e.g. ruby extensions--and other > users will be able to use it without having their > LD_LIBRARY_PATH set. They'll only require PATH. > I sure this makes sense, but I'm missing the mental model--the picture of what's happening--that would explain /why/ it makes sense. These variables aren't mentioned in the Makefile, so they must be important to gcc. But why, if I'm /creating/ the lib as part of the process?? Finally, it looks as though install-all is what I want, because install looks seems to a documentn-free install. I'm not conversant enough with the Ruby build to be sure I'm reading the Makefile right, but what I see is this: > > install: install-nodoc $(RDOCTARGET) > install-all: install-nodoc install-doc > Where RDOCTARGET is defined as nil, by default. If it's supposed to be specified, it's not mentioned in the Makefile. So I'm guessing that the target I really want is install-all. But I'd like to confirm that. So the process that /looks/ right to me, at the moment, is: make distclean setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /wherever/you/want/lib setenv LD_RUN_PATH /wherever/you/want/lib ./configure --prefix=/wherever/you/want make make install-all I'll try it, but I feel like a blind man groping in the dark. I was hoping for confirmation and/or a bit more enlightenment before going forward...
on 2006-05-19 01:59
on 2006-05-19 02:11
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Eric A. wrote: >> inter-operate nicely--e.g. ruby extensions--and other >> users will be able to use it without having their >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH set. They'll only require PATH. >> > I sure this makes sense, but I'm missing the mental > model--the picture of what's happening--that would > explain /why/ it makes sense. These variables aren't > mentioned in the Makefile, so they must be important > to gcc. But why, if I'm /creating/ the lib as part > of the process?? it has nothing to do with ruby, the Makefile, or gcc - it's all about your linker: man ld.so man ld http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/brow... http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/brow... http://www.visi.com/~barr/ldpath.html let me know if this doesn't shed some light. regards. -a
on 2006-05-19 06:30
Ah ha!! Thanks much for the additional info, Ara. Your 5 May 2004 writeup was particularly good: > > You have two good choices > > a) install ruby where your system looks for stuff > > b) configure your system to look where ruby puts stuff > > Having LD_RUN_PATH set at compile time encodes it > in the binaries. It sets up all the bins and libs so > they know where to look for things. You also give a good diagnostic tool: > > In general, if you are having load errors do this > > ruby -e 'p $LOAD_PATH' > > this tells you where ruby looks for things. In your 32 Mar 2006 msg, you gave a really nice recipe: > > If you follow these steps just about anything will work: > > - chose a common nfs location. we'll call it /nfs > > - every single time you compile something do this > > export LD_RUN_PATH=/nfs/lib > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/nfs/lib > ./configure --prefix=/nfs && make && make install > > I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_RUN_PATH in my .bashrc > because i do this so much. the cool thing with > LD_RUN_PATH is that it encodes inter-library dependencies > (so ruby tk.so needs libtk.so needs ...) , so users don't > have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH themselves...They just have to > add /nfs/bin to their path. So it appears that: LD_RUN_PATH tells the binaries where to look for things when they're running LD_LIBRARY_PATH tells the linker where to look for things when it is creating the binaries The installation sequence for a non-standard location Solaris location therefore turns out to be: # Clear out a previous build & create config.h make distclean ./configure --prefix=/wherever/you/want # Set the values you need when compiling sh: export LD_RUN_PATH=/wherever/you/want/lib/ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/wherever/you/want/lib/ csh: setenv LD_RUN_PATH /wherever/you/want/lib/ setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /wherever/you/want/lib/ # Compile without installing, then install binaries & docs make make install-all Thanks again. Considering that your original post on this subject was in 2004, I can see why your responses have become shorter! I greatly appreciate your help, and am glad to say that I now have functional installation of Ruby. P.S. I'll be happy to put this information on a Wiki page somewhere. I went to RubyGarden, but only saw a small comment box. I could stuff it in there, post at my weblog, or put it anywhere else that will let the community find it easily. Suggestions?