Forum: Ruby ruby sdbm library reliable?

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Jamey C. (Guest)
on 2006-05-16 18:38
(Received via mailing list)
Does anyone have any recent experience with using Ruby's sdbm library?
I googled for this and found a message thread from a few years ago
indicating that it wasn't reliable, but I couldn't find any recent
info.  Has it improved in reliability?

The reason I'm looking at sdbm is that, according to Pickaxe, the
underlying SDBM library is included with  the standard Ruby
distribution, so if Ruby is installed, it's pretty much a guarantee that
sdbm is also.

I would be looking at storing up to a million records, with each record
being up to 200 bytes, and each key being up to 7 bytes.

If no one has any recent experience with sdbm, I will go ahead and run
some tests and report the results back here.  I just thought that if
someone else had already done this, it would save me the effort.

Thanks!

Jamey C.

Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email and
any materials contained in any attachments is prohibited. If you receive
this message in error, or are not the intended recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender by email and destroy all copies of the
original message, including attachments.
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.