Forum: Ruby on Rails RE: Should controllers be "smart"?

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Chris B. (Guest)
on 2006-05-05 05:36
(Received via mailing list)
Ok,

Sorry for the confusion.  The others are absolutely right.  I have
translated the traditional 3-tired architecture (data layer, business
layer, presentation layer) right into the MVC pattern.  This is
completely incorrect.

Prior to ORM tools and the like, I would typically create my classes to
be data (direct calls to from database), business (handles all business
specific functions and calls the data object), and presentation jsp/php,
etc.  I somehow associated that as being the same as MVC.


Sorry,


Chris
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.