Forum: Ruby Ruby, Constants, and the real world

Announcement (2017-05-07): is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see and for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
pat eyler (Guest)
on 2006-04-21 21:50
(Received via mailing list)
For as much flack as Ruby takes for having constants which can be
changed, I was amused to find this aritcle:

posted at slashdot.  The headline is:  Another fundamental constant
accused of changing

Maybe Ruby's got the right approach after all, huh?

Robert D. (Guest)
on 2006-04-21 23:51
(Received via mailing list)
On 4/21/06, pat eyler <removed_email_address@domain.invalid> wrote:
> Maybe Ruby's got the right approach after all, huh?
mu is *not* a constant, Mu is ;) and of course ruby is right what did


> thanks,
> -pate
> -------------------------

Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la bêtise humaine ; en ce qui
concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.

- Albert Einstein
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.