Forum: Ruby on Rails Another Issue - don't get sick of me yet

Announcement (2017-05-07): www.ruby-forum.com is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see rubyonrails.org/community and ruby-lang.org/en/community for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
a.filipowski (Guest)
on 2005-11-18 19:53
(Received via mailing list)
Ok this is happened to me a couple of times now and can't seem to
figure out how or why. This goes back to my issue of creating tables
based off of an item that is created. First I have this code:

ActiveRecord::Schema.define do
     			create_table(itemtablename, :options => 'ENGINE=InnoDB
DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8') do |t|
       			t.column :field_type,	:string, :null => false
       			t.column :item_text,	:text, :null => false
       			t.column :required, :tinyint, :null => false, :default => '0'
       			t.column :image, :text, :null => true
   				end
   			end

now I tried to use this statement in both my controller and my model:

ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SchemaStatements.create_table(

but I would get a undefined method `create_table' for
ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SchemaStatements:Module error.

I am having the same issue with running the

ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::DatabaseStatements.execute(

command. I am trying to add data to the table that i created and the
only way I can tell how to do that is by doing everything manual as
the table names are going to be changing based on what item the user
is creating or editing.

I am connecting to a MySQL 5 db which as of right now is what we plan
to run in production and I did install the mysql adapter (at least I
think I did as it told me I successfully installed it.)

How do I reference a different module?

sorry for the dumb question but this is really starting to get on my
nerves. I feel like I am so close yet so far away.

Andrew
christopher.k.hall (Guest)
on 2005-11-18 20:08
(Received via mailing list)
why not just use one table to hold ALL items? then you don't have to
worry
about all this dynamic table creation stuff.
a.filipowski (Guest)
on 2005-11-19 00:22
(Received via mailing list)
Yeah,
after rethinking the design of the database and the app this is the
route I am going to go.

Andrew
alex (Guest)
on 2005-11-19 17:52
(Received via mailing list)
This is more a question for the more experienced among us:  Are there
any situations when dynamic table creation is a preferred technique?  I
have a sneaking suspicion that anything that can be done by dynamically
creating tables can be replicated with a static structure, but is it
ever better not to?

--
Alex
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.