> I've decided that it's much easier to > show paragraphs and headings (look at all the nice blog sites > out there) than rows and columns, but that doesn't mean that > rows and columns needs to look like crap! True that. But, one good resource for CSS-tricks is the CSS-List Wiki: List of links to style "Nicer Tables": css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=NicerTables > Oh well - my graphic artist friend is off now mocking up some > pages for me in Dreamweaver. She thinks it doesn't look that > bad as it currently stands; I'm not sure if that's a good or > bad thing. Sounds like a good thing!
on 2006-02-25 01:56
on 2006-02-25 02:47
I want to eat this homepage: http://haveamint.com/ No tables ! Of course, check out the "demo" page of the actual product, and it does indeed use tables. DD's are good to use for tablesque stuff. The W3C has some pretty good descriptions of exactly *what* should be used for what in the layout realm. I know this stuff as I've read about it... Personally, I couldn't design my way out of a wet paper bag with the scissor tool.