Hoi rubyists, just wanted to state my opinion about mailreader. Imo it's freaking dangerous to include something in the core distribution which doesn't get emails right :) It might be amusing to parse and look some at your emails, but if you want to seriously work with them, you can't just use it. Neither is there any order of headers preserved (as is not required but asked for by rfc2822), nor is the storage of headers in a hash appropriate (you can have multiple headers with the same key and you shouldn't be losing them). There's probably more serious problems in there. I'm aware this package is a 'basic' mail parsing capability, yet even though it's 'basic' it should be *correct*! Next thing included is an Integer class whose '+' method works ok if the number is even but does a '-' when the number is odd ? (grmbl) *goes off junking half of his code to test rubymail now* Thanks for listening. -Martin
on 2006-02-24 14:59
on 2006-02-27 18:11
On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Martin S. Weber wrote: > Next thing included is an Integer class > whose '+' method works ok if the number is even but does a '-' when > the number > is odd ? (grmb I don't know anything about MailRead, but what do you mean in the above?
on 2006-02-27 18:30
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:10:09AM +0900, Logan C. wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Martin S. Weber wrote: > > >Next thing included is an Integer class > >whose '+' method works ok if the number is even but does a '-' when > >the number > >is odd ? (grmb > > I don't know anything about MailRead, but what do you mean in the above? > It's a sarcastic analogy for mailread working fine for some kinds of inputs and just performing plain wrong for other kinds of inputs and the fact that this fact is just ignored with its inclusion in the standard distribution. Would you expect a standard arithmetic package to get exponentation wrong? Would you expect a standard email parser package to get email headers wrong? -Martin
on 2006-03-01 20:12
Looks like this has recently been discussed on ruby-core... start of thread http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... mention of dropping headers which may appear multiple times http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/... I don't see that anything has been committed to CVS since... though I could be wrong. -A