Forum: Ruby on Rails stack level too deep problem

Announcement (2017-05-07): is now read-only since I unfortunately do not have the time to support and maintain the forum any more. Please see and for other Rails- und Ruby-related community platforms.
Paul C. (Guest)
on 2006-01-11 07:56
(Received via mailing list)
Hi all, I'm trying to overload the link_to function, (to disable link_to
the user has no access right)
this is my code,  it work the first time I run the application, the
time I refresh the page I always get "stack level too deep error"

module UsersHelper
  include ActionView::Helpers::UrlHelper

  alias_method :link_to_original, :link_to

  def permission?

  def link_to(name, options = {}, html_options =
     if permission?
       link_to_original( name,
options,html_options,*parameters_for_method_reference )


the error message
howing app/views/users/_table.rhtml where line #40 raised:

stack level too deep

Extracted source (around line #40):

38: <th id="movTable_<%=column %>">
39: 	<%#{if $movtable.table.columns.$curr_key.sortable eq true}
41: 		#<a href={$movtable.table.columns.$curr_key.url}>
42: 		#{$movtable.table.columns.$curr_key.nome}
43: 		#</a>

Trace of template inclusion: /app/views/users/list.rhtml

RAILS_ROOT: ./script/../config/..
Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace

#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to_original'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to_original'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to_original'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to_original'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to_original'

..... it repeat  on an on

#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/users_helper.rb:12:in `link_to'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/movtable_helper.rb:121:in `sort_link'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/views/users/_table.rhtml:36:in `each'
Joerg D. (Guest)
on 2006-01-11 12:30
I think when you call link_to_original in the link_to method, it calls
the link_to method again because link_to_original is aliased to link_to.
Alias does not make a 'copy' of the original function. You're just
creating another name for it.

Why do you not just use link_to_if or link_to_unless ... the first
parameter is a condition. If it fails, the link just becomes limp and
harmless text.
Paul C. (Guest)
on 2006-01-12 02:24
(Received via mailing list)
I try to use back the link_to that was generated by the scaffold, to
avoid modification of the rthml file.

so it there a way to improve my code so that it will work?
Mike H. (Guest)
on 2006-01-13 20:36
(Received via mailing list)
I've had a similar problem.  What you have to realize is that the
alias_method call isn't like declaring something at the class level in a
java-type language.  It's a call to a class method, and it can occur
more than once.

Your alias_method call is getting called twice.  the first time, it
aliases link_to_original to the standard link_to method, since you have
not yet overridden linkto.  You then override link_to.  So far so good.
However, when alias_method gets called the second time (for whatever
reason), it aliases link_to_original to the current def of link_to,
which is now your overridden version.  When link_to_original
subsequently gets referenced in your new link_to, it points to your new
link_to, creating an infinite loop.

Why is your class def being parsed twice?  I dunno.

To fix this, replace your alias_method with this

alias_method(:link_to_original, :link_to) unless

that should do the trick.

Hope that helps.
Mike H. (Guest)
on 2006-01-21 16:39
(Received via mailing list)
alias_method is fact (essentially) does create a copy of the method.
See the following:

class Foo
  def a

f =

puts f.a #a

class Foo
  alias_method :b, :a

puts f.a #a
puts f.b #a

class Foo
  def a

puts f.a #anew
puts f.b #a

aliasing b to point to a, then redefining a doesn't make b points to the
new a.  b still points to the original a method.
Rod M. (Guest)
on 2011-01-24 19:16
Thanks. I was doing exactly the same thing and having exactly the same
issue. The only difference was I had original_link_to not
This topic is locked and can not be replied to.