> > Thats not entirely through, > > entirely true, ouch... Well... for all practical purposes, it is true. But, technically, you could use Tomcat's webserver and CGI capabilities -- at least this was true the last time I checked (v4). We'd be hard-pressed to find anyone using this in a production environment though...
on 2006-01-05 03:18
on 2006-01-05 04:03
That's interesting. One of the big reasons to use J2EE is that servlets scale much better than CGI scripts because only a single instance of each servlet is used to service all requests. Does that mean that using Rails with Apache is going back to the CGI approach? The Rails book lists FastCGI as an alternative to CGI. Does that change the situation? Most of the clients I've worked with are already set-up to use one of the major J2EE application servers, like WebSphere, WebLogic, or JBoss. Assuming they already use a separate web server (i.e., Apache), how do you deploy production Rails applications in those environments? Do people use the FastCGI approach? I seriously doubt any of my clients are going to be interested in replacing their existing web servers. I freely admit that it's likely I'm missing something, since my background is obviously Java and I've only just begun my journey toward Rails. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Ken -- Kenneth A. Kousen, Ph.D. President Kousen IT, Inc. http://www.kousenit.com firstname.lastname@example.org