Issue #7968 has been reported by cs96and (Alan Davies). ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968 Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: cruby-windows Category: platform/windows Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan.
on 2013-02-26 12:56
on 2013-03-01 16:44
Issue #7968 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga). Status changed from Closed to Open % Done changed from 100 to 0 ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968#change-37227 Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: cruby-windows Category: platform/windows Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan.
on 2013-03-05 18:03
Issue #7968 has been updated by cs96and (Alan Davies). I see the %Done went up to 100 and back down to zero. Is this fixed or not now? Thanks Alan. ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968#change-37309 Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: cruby-windows Category: platform/windows Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan.
on 2013-03-05 18:22
Issue #7968 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga). Hello, Alan. I re-open this ticket because it was accidentally closed by wrong commit message. This issue is not fixed yet. BTW, in socketsendtest.rb UDPSocket#bind and #connect receive different port number. Is it right? On my environment, I've got an exception. socketsendtest.rb:9:in `send': Connection refused - send(2) (Errno::ECONNREFUSED) Thanks ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968#change-37310 Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: cruby-windows Category: platform/windows Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan.
on 2013-03-09 19:42
Issue #7968 has been updated by cs96and (Alan Davies). The bind and connect can be different. The bind specifies what port you are sending from, and connect specifies the port you are sending to (the ip address can be a different box too). It runs fine for me with different ports, but you can make them the same if you want. ---------------------------------------- Bug #7968: Poor UDPSocket#send performance in ruby 2.0.0 on windows https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7968#change-37444 Author: cs96and (Alan Davies) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: cruby-windows Category: platform/windows Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] I have noticed that the performance of UDPSocket#send on ruby 2.0.0 on windows is much poorer than that of 1.9.3 or 1.8.7. Running the attahced script on 2.0.0 gives the following... d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m2.572s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.016s However, running the same test with 1.9.3 is much faster... d:\scripts>pik 193 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i386-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.993s user 0m0.015s sys 0m0.016s Additionally, if I change the send call to a print (commented out in the script), then the performance is fine on 2.0.0.... d:\scripts>pik 200 d:\scripts>bash -c "ruby --version" ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24) [x64-mingw32] d:\scripts>bash -c "time ruby socketsendtest.rb" real 0m0.907s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.015s What is send() doing that print() doesn't do that is causing the massive performance drop? Thanks Alan.
Enable email notification
Enable multi-page viewPlease log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.