You dont get to start telling people that after all the un-googled, no-try, easily solvable questions YOU have been dumping to the channel. You dont get to flip the script on everyone else. You were told that because youve done NO research on your own, youre asking every little teeny tiny question that pops into your head over and over and over and over and over and over... ad nauseum to the list. Take your OWN advise and publish what you googled, what the problem is, what you expected to happen, what actually happened, why YOU *THINK* it happened that way, etc. Show that youre actually using your brain to try to solve the problem FIRST before you ask us for help. You dont get to start telling others to follow that when you dont follow it yourself. -- D. Deryl Downey "The bug which you would fright me with I seek" - William Shakespeare - The Winter's Tale, Act III, Scene II - A court of Justice. *From:* Love U Ruby <lists@ruby-forum.com> *Sent:* February 15, 2013 9:22 AM *To:* ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org> *Subject:* Re: Ruby Multithreaded producer-consumer problem Abhijit Sarkar wrote in post #1097009: > I rewrote the code using MonitorMixin and then back to using Mutex, same > result. I used 2 ConditionVariable, same result :( If it's not working, > it's certainly not for the lack of trying. How much have you tried? Your description not showing that.. You should Google first.. Then try those all. Let us know what have you tried and what you got. thanks
on 2013-02-15 15:39
on 2013-02-15 18:09
D. Deryl Downey wrote in post #1097087: > You dont get to start telling people that after all the un-googled, > no-try, easily solvable questions YOU have been dumping to the channel. > You > dont get to flip the script on everyone else. Who are you to tell me what I get to do? You've an opinion, that's fine, almost everyone has one. Keep it to yourself, don't start threads trying to intimidate people because it is not going to work on me. > You were told that because youve done NO research on your own, youre > asking every little teeny tiny question that pops into your head over > and > over and over and over and over and over... ad nauseum to the list. Before learning Ruby, you need to learn some English. "youre", "nauseum", seriously? >You dont get to start telling others to follow that when you dont follow >it yourself. Here's a good advice. Stand in front of a mirror and say that to yourself.
on 2013-02-15 18:13
I think he was talking to "Love U Ruby" not you...which means all of his comments were 100% relevant, that guy has been spamming the list. -Ryan
on 2013-02-15 18:16
Ryan Victory wrote in post #1097122:
> I think he was talking to "Love U Ruby" not you
Well he started a thread using the question I posted, so it's hard to
tell.
on 2013-02-15 18:18
Subject: Re: Ruby Multithreaded producer-consumer problem
Date: sab 16 feb 13 02:10:00 +0900
Quoting Abhijit Sarkar (lists@ruby-forum.com):
> Who are you to tell me what I get to do?
What nostalgia! It was AGES since I could witness a REAL, sparkling
flamewar...
Yuppie!!
Carlo
on 2013-02-15 18:25
I agree with Ryan, maybe it's the difference between seeing the threads on the forum and the mailing list ? In the mailing list it appears as a reply to Love U Ruby's "go and google it" comment.
on 2013-02-15 19:06
Tony Headford wrote in post #1097131: > I agree with Ryan, maybe it's the difference between seeing the threads > on the forum and the mailing list ? > In the mailing list it appears as a reply to Love U Ruby's "go and > google it" comment. If that's so, I've no problem apologizing to DDD. I was taken by surprise by his unexpected post bashing, what seemed to be, me. I'll send him a PM :)
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.