Forum: NGINX nginx deployments survey

Hello,

We had a pretty packed 2012 in regards to nginx development. We've got a 
lot of feedback too from a variety of users.

However as we gear up for the new development cycle in 2013, we'd 
appreciate a lot if you could spare 7-10 minutes of your time and take a 
look at our online survey:

http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/

This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust priorities 
in 2013 and to make nginx better.

Many thanks in advance!

--
Andrew Alexeev
nginx

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Done!
Thanks for the excellent work in the past 2012!

2013/1/9 Andrew Alexeev <andrew@nginx.com>:

Hai Andrew,

Am 09-01-2013 11:01, schrieb Andrew Alexeev:
> Hello,

[snipp]

> http://nginx-survey.questionpro.com/
>
> This survey will help us greatly to define goals and adjust
> priorities in 2013 and to make nginx better.
>
> Many thanks in advance!

It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means
to nginx roadmap.

Best regards
Aleks

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:

>> Many thanks in advance!
>
> It would be nice to have a survey response analyse and what that means to nginx 
roadmap.

Definitely. But first we need more responses to make it statistically 
valid :) And then we'll definitely plan to make a blog post or something 
with an aggregated summary and notes about roadmap.

Thanks a lot for those participating!

Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be
sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets 
done
faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to 
get
it done.

Posted at Nginx Forum: 
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071

On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:41 PM, itpp2012 wrote:

> Done! maybe something to think about, allow a feature request to be
> sponsored, for example SiT has this, if many sponsor a request it gets done
> faster or if few sponsor a request, it requires higher sponsor fees to get
> it done.
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum: 
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071

Thanks for completing the survey and thanks for the suggestion. We 
actually have this, though it's currently structured a bit differently 
(single/few sponsors per feature vs. crowdfunding)

During 2012 the following features were sponsored:

- SPDY (Automattic)
- OCSP Stapling (GlobalSign, Comodo, DigiCert)
- Chunked transfer encoding on input (sponsor preferred to refrain from 
public announcement)
- WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be 
disclosed)

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Andrew Alexeev <andrew@nginx.com> 
wrote:

> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,234835,235071#msg-235071
> public announcement)
> - WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be disclosed)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>


- WebSockets (due to be ready soon, and the sponsors list to be 
disclosed)
     Are we expecting by this week !

--Tarak