Ok, Im aware about the damage as a result of direct connection, But now the question is How to recovery the m(t) signal in spite of noise? That is, finally the I and Q in rx should be equal to I and Q in tx.
on 2013-01-08 19:50
on 2013-01-08 20:16
On 08 Jan 2013 13:49, José María Valencia wrote: > Ok, I'm aware about the damage as a result of direct connection, > > But now the question is How to recovery the m(t) signal in spite of noise? That is, finally the I and Q in rx should be equal to I and Q in tx. The values of I/Q at the receiver will, hopefully, be linearly-proportional to the values as transmitted. When you use radio systems to convey *information*, you use those signals to *encode* that information, using modulation schemes that only require that the signals be linearly-proportional (and sometimes not even that) to the signals as sent. That's how radio works. You modulate information onto a carrier, and demodulate that carrier to recover the original (or a reasonable facsimile of the original) information. The Universe conspires to mangle electromagnetic waves, to a greater or lesser extent, depending on a number of factors including wavelength, distance, interference, etc, etc, etc. If you rely on the received signal to be *identical* to the transmitted signal, then you are living in a conceptual state of sin, and must revise your thinking.
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.