I know unak-san was asking about a 1.9.3 patch level release, so I wanted to bring it up for discussion.
on 2012-12-20 16:43
on 2012-12-20 20:03
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net> wrote: > I know unak-san was asking about a 1.9.3 patch level release, so I > wanted to bring it up for discussion. > I would love a release, but since latest merges I see one failure happening on Windows: http://ci.rubyinstaller.org/job/ruby-1_9_3-x64-tes... http://ci.rubyinstaller.org/job/ruby-1_9_3-x86-tes... 1) Error: test_chars(TestArgf): ArgumentError: dump format error(0x67) C:/Users/Worker/Jenkins/workspace/ruby-1_9_3-x64-build/test/ruby/test_argf.rb:772:in `load' C:/Users/Worker/Jenkins/workspace/ruby-1_9_3-x64-build/test/ruby/test_argf.rb:772:in `block in test_chars' C:/Users/Worker/Jenkins/workspace/ruby-1_9_3-x64-build/test/ruby/test_argf.rb:49:in `ruby' C:/Users/Worker/Jenkins/workspace/ruby-1_9_3-x64-build/test/ruby/test_argf.rb:769:in `test_chars' This seems to be new and wasn't happening before. To my bad, I don't have time to dig into this until next week :(
on 2012-12-21 04:51
Hi, 2012/12/21 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>: > http://ci.rubyinstaller.org/job/ruby-1_9_3-x86-tes... > C:/Users/Worker/Jenkins/workspace/ruby-1_9_3-x64-build/test/ruby/test_argf.rb:769:in > `test_chars' > > This seems to be new and wasn't happening before. > > To my bad, I don't have time to dig into this until next week :( In order to fix this error, the change set r37862(https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/rep...) should be backported. Regards, Park Heesob
on 2012-12-21 08:05
Hello,
Thank you all, I've backported it now.
In message "[ruby-core:51021] Re: 1.9.3 patch level release"
on Dec.21,2012 12:51:16, <phasis@gmail.com> wrote:
> > happening on Windows:
> > `block in test_chars'
>
r37862(https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/rep...)
> should be backported.
>
> Regards,
>
> Park Heesob
Regards,
on 2012-12-21 08:12
Hello,
In message "[ruby-core:51015] 1.9.3 patch level release"
on Dec.21,2012 00:43:00, <zachary@zacharyscott.net> wrote:
> I know unak-san was asking about a 1.9.3 patch level release, so I
> wanted to bring it up for discussion.
Ah, It's confidential that Santa Claus is coming to us :)
Currently, RubyCI status is green about 1.9.3.
(OS X reports an error, but it's CI servers' problem.)
RubyInstaller CI reports an error, but it was fixed, I hope.
So, if any accident does not occur by somewhere, maybe something
will happen at Christmas.
Regards,
on 2012-12-21 08:35
Dne 21.12.2012 8:12, U.Nakamura napsal(a): > (OS X reports an error, but it's CI servers' problem.) > RubyInstaller CI reports an error, but it was fixed, I hope. > > So, if any accident does not occur by somewhere, maybe something > will happen at Christmas. > > > Regards, If only https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6573 would be fixed there .... V
on 2012-12-21 14:13
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Vt Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wrote: > > If only https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6573 would be fixed there .... > Vit, do you have a CI we can look at when working on fixes? Because is really hard to keep track of every single failure on every single platform. The reason RubyInstaller CI was setup is that I was tired of running and reporting tests a couple of times a week. Having those available for everybody to see, and specially for committers to see if their changes break something.
on 2012-12-21 14:44
2012/12/21 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> > and reporting tests a couple of times a week. Having those available > for everybody to see, and specially for committers to see if their > changes break something. > Yay, of course I would love to see CI running our builds and this would be definitely the most annoying bug because of its randomness. Unfortunately we are not there yet and there is no schedule to establish CI. But you definitely prioritized CI on my TODO list :) Vt
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.