Forum: Ruby on Rails Rails self referential association

i have a user model with fields name and sex. And each user can have an
one-to-one association called "father" with a male user.

So in user model i added a field father_id and added association like
this,

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :father, :class_name => 'User', :inverse_of => :user,
:foreign_key => "father_id"
  has_one :user, :class_name => 'User', :inverse_of => :father

  SEX=["male", "female"]

  validates :sex, :presence => true,:inclusion => { :in => SEX }

end

now it can make both female user and male user as father. How could i
restrict it to make user as father only whose sex is male?

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:53 PM, ariv arasan <lists@ruby-forum.com> 
wrote:

>
>   SEX=["male", "female"]
>
>   validates :sex, :presence => true,:inclusion => { :in => SEX }
>
> end
>

hmm i think you just need to define a custom validation

validates :validates_father_is_a_male

private

def validates_father_is_a_male
  errors.add(:father_id, 'is not a male') if father && father.sex == 
'male'
end


> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>


--

yes, custom validation helps me.

i modified your code a little for my need,

validate :validates_father_is_a_male

private

def validates_father_is_a_male
  errors.add(:father_id, 'is not a male') if father && father.sex ==
'female'
end

Thanks a lot!

On 22 November 2012 10:51, ariv arasan <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> 'female'
> end

Don't forget to allow for some of the less conventional situations
that can occur in modern life where male and female conditions are not
immutable and parents may not necessarily be of different sexes.  It
is possible for someone classed as female to also be a father.  It may
be better to allow the user to worry about these things rather than
force validations on them.

Colin

@Colin

sure, will consider it.

Thanks