Issue #7418 has been reported by charliesome (Charlie Somerville). ---------------------------------------- Feature #7418: Kernel#used_refinements https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7418 Author: charliesome (Charlie Somerville) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: I'd like to propose a method that returns an array of all refinements visible from the current scope. I have documented the ordering of the return array as undefined to allow a bit of flexibility in how it is implemented across the various Ruby implementations. One of the criticisms of refinements is that its use makes code harder to understand - especially when non-lexical refinements are being used. This method slightly improves the situation by making debugging of code using refinements easier. I've named the method 'used_refinements' for now, but I'm open to changing that to something else. I've already done the initial implementation which is attached as a patch. Feedback would be most appreciated.
on 2012-11-21 12:17
on 2012-11-21 14:49
Maybe it should be called Module.refinements (a la Module.nesting). // Magnus Holm On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:16 PM, charliesome (Charlie Somerville)
on 2012-11-22 05:23
Issue #7418 has been updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda). Status changed from Open to Assigned Assignee set to shugo (Shugo Maeda) judofyr (Magnus Holm) wrote: > Maybe it should be called Module.refinements (a la Module.nesting). Module.refinements conflicts with Module#refinements, which returns refinements defined in the receiver. ---------------------------------------- Feature #7418: Kernel#used_refinements https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7418#change-33462 Author: charliesome (Charlie Somerville) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda) Category: Target version: I'd like to propose a method that returns an array of all refinements visible from the current scope. I have documented the ordering of the return array as undefined to allow a bit of flexibility in how it is implemented across the various Ruby implementations. One of the criticisms of refinements is that its use makes code harder to understand - especially when non-lexical refinements are being used. This method slightly improves the situation by making debugging of code using refinements easier. I've named the method 'used_refinements' for now, but I'm open to changing that to something else. I've already done the initial implementation which is attached as a patch. Feedback would be most appreciated.
on 2012-11-24 03:53
Issue #7418 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Target version set to next minor Shugo, is this feature mandatory for the 2.0.0 refinements? I'm setting to next minor tentatively. -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> ---------------------------------------- Feature #7418: Kernel#used_refinements https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7418#change-33752 Author: charliesome (Charlie Somerville) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda) Category: Target version: next minor I'd like to propose a method that returns an array of all refinements visible from the current scope. I have documented the ordering of the return array as undefined to allow a bit of flexibility in how it is implemented across the various Ruby implementations. One of the criticisms of refinements is that its use makes code harder to understand - especially when non-lexical refinements are being used. This method slightly improves the situation by making debugging of code using refinements easier. I've named the method 'used_refinements' for now, but I'm open to changing that to something else. I've already done the initial implementation which is attached as a patch. Feedback would be most appreciated.
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
(Switch to SSL-encrypted connection)
NEW: Do you have a Google/GoogleMail or Yahoo account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
Log in with Google account | Log in with Yahoo account
No account? Register here.